2001
DOI: 10.1243/0954409011531503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and design of a low-noise railway wheel

Abstract: The design and construction of a new ‘constrained layer’ damping treatment for railway wheels is presented. A numerical procedure was used for the loss factor calculation. This procedure, first verified on a plate by means of experimental modal analyses, allowed the best treatment thickness and arrangement to be chosen among those commercially available and technologically feasible. The work ended with the construction of a prototype and subsequent tests in the laboratory and in the field. The success of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different ways of increasing wheel damping have been reported in the literature, and the most important methods are the use of resilient wheels [6][7][8][9], ring dampers [6,[10][11][12][13], CAF dampers [14][15][16], and constrained layer dampers, both as a treatment applied to the wheel web [1,6,8,[17][18][19] and as tuned dampers [1,6,20,21].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different ways of increasing wheel damping have been reported in the literature, and the most important methods are the use of resilient wheels [6][7][8][9], ring dampers [6,[10][11][12][13], CAF dampers [14][15][16], and constrained layer dampers, both as a treatment applied to the wheel web [1,6,8,[17][18][19] and as tuned dampers [1,6,20,21].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to railway wheels, Cervello et al [17] and Nielsen and Fredö [36] studied the application of CLDs on the entire wheel web surface, concluding that noise emission could be significantly reduced. Cervello et al [17] reduced noise by about 20 dB in laboratory measurements and by about 10 dB in the field compared to the standard wheel noise emission. Nielsen and Fredö [36] developed a numerical procedure for optimizing railway wheels in terms of fatigue strength and minimal rolling noise.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eqs. (5) and (6) show that the process is stationary. In the case of a random process, stationary, Gaussian, the following equation must be satisfied by using the mean m and standard deviation δ:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The average value of the stress is not null because of the static contribution from the weight of the part and premature tightening. Cervello [6] analyzed and studied the design of railway wheels with weak noise. A numerical procedure was used for calculation of the loss factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, squeal noise of 100-110 dB is generated when a train passes through a curve about 7.5 m from the center of the rail; this is 15-20 dB higher than the rolling noise of the vehicle, and one or more pure tone noises occur at frequencies of 400-10,000 Hz [5]. Curve noise is generated mainly in sections of a track with a curve radius of less than 300 m. If the ratio of the axle distance to the curve radius is 100 or less, the probability of generating a squealing noise is high [6,7]. Flange noise manifest differently based on the contact position of the wheel and the rail when the curve is passed over [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%