2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2018.2858184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Design of a High Power Density Flying-Capacitor Multilevel Boost Converter for High Step-Up Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAD converter has a higher cost than the Buck converter mainly due to additional isolated power supplies. Similar cost increases have also been found in the SCCs [7,13] and the converters hybridizing an SCC and a Buck converter [14][15][16][17] which are commonly used in certain applications [7,13,14]. Although the cost of the MAD converter is higher than the cost of the Buck converter, the output voltage ripple reduction is significant, for example, 72% at fsw =100kHz or 99% at fsw=1MHz as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Proposed Mad Converter And Buck Cosupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MAD converter has a higher cost than the Buck converter mainly due to additional isolated power supplies. Similar cost increases have also been found in the SCCs [7,13] and the converters hybridizing an SCC and a Buck converter [14][15][16][17] which are commonly used in certain applications [7,13,14]. Although the cost of the MAD converter is higher than the cost of the Buck converter, the output voltage ripple reduction is significant, for example, 72% at fsw =100kHz or 99% at fsw=1MHz as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Proposed Mad Converter And Buck Cosupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The comparison between (12) and (13) shows that ΔVo in the MAD converter is reduced because ΔVo_MAD is proportional to 1/fsw 3 while ΔVo_buck of the DCM Buck converter is proportional to 1/fsw. Moreover, the coefficient in (12) is smaller than the coefficient in (13). Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Proposed Mad Converter And Buck Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the capabilities of traditional power electronics converters, a clear trend is visible towards topologies that implement more switches and capacitors to achieve higher power densities compared to traditional designs that rely on magnetics [67]. Numerous examples can be found in high step-down converters [68][69][70], high step-up converters [56,71,72] and PV or wind power inverters [73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage is that the gate signals of the switches are phase-shifted by half the switching period Ts, leading to an effective ripple current reduction in the input. The main disadvantage of this converter is that two inductors and a transformer are used, making it rather bulky compared to, for example, switched capacitor or flying capacitor boost converters [11,12]. An overview of the used components for evaluating the converter is given in Table 1.…”
Section: Electrical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%