2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and evaluation of friction effects on mode II delamination testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In compliance with the proposed methodology, load-displacement and S−N data have been extracted from reported data in [57], as depicted in figures 7 and 8 respectively. Node-to-surface interaction has been established between the bonded region of FST and HC, and hard contact normal behaviour along with tangential behaviour with friction formulation coefficient having a value of 0.8 [61,62]. Besides this, the unbonded region is again provided with a 'Penalty' constraint enforcement method to prevent any penetration of the facesheet in the honeycomb core.…”
Section:  Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In compliance with the proposed methodology, load-displacement and S−N data have been extracted from reported data in [57], as depicted in figures 7 and 8 respectively. Node-to-surface interaction has been established between the bonded region of FST and HC, and hard contact normal behaviour along with tangential behaviour with friction formulation coefficient having a value of 0.8 [61,62]. Besides this, the unbonded region is again provided with a 'Penalty' constraint enforcement method to prevent any penetration of the facesheet in the honeycomb core.…”
Section:  Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All produced specimens had a total length of 280 mm. In order to optimize the use of material, the specimens for mode I, were cut in a width of 10 mm, expecting to follow a plane strain approximation according to Pappas and Botsis (2016), while the ones for mode II at 25 mm width, as in Mencattelli et al (2018). Specimen preparation and apparatus for the testing of the mode I experiments were the same with the ones reported in Pappas and Botsis (2016).…”
Section: Fracture Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimen preparation and apparatus for the testing of the mode I experiments were the same with the ones reported in Pappas and Botsis (2016). The corresponding ones for mode II were the ones reported in Mencattelli et al (2018) using the 4ENF configuration with ball bearings, mounted though in an MTS hydraulic testing machine equipped with a 100 kN load cell, since high loads were expected (loads up to 12 kN were finally measured). The choice of thickness of the aluminum panel was made to avoid any plastic deformation far from the crack front based on the range of anticipated toughness.…”
Section: Fracture Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the mechanical performance of bamboo and concrete affects the quality of bonding between bamboo and concrete. Connectors plastically deformed before damaging bamboo and concrete [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%