2014
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.926013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and modelling of rainfall fields at different resolutions in southern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Djibo et al [12] used a probabilistic approach statistical seasonal streamflow forecasting over West African Sahel; the input variables were sea level pressure, relative humidity, and air temperature. Biondi and De Luca [13,14] considered a simple lumped and conceptual rainfall-runoff model for design flood estimation in gauged and ungauged catchments in southern Italy, by considering as input 500-years of 20-min synthetic rainfall data, derived from a daily rainfall generator and a specific downscaling procedure for Southern Italy. Previous studies primarily focused on precipitation and antecedent runoff as the inputs for runoff forecasting, however, less attention was paid to fully incorporate large-scale climate variables and other local-scale climate variables as the inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Djibo et al [12] used a probabilistic approach statistical seasonal streamflow forecasting over West African Sahel; the input variables were sea level pressure, relative humidity, and air temperature. Biondi and De Luca [13,14] considered a simple lumped and conceptual rainfall-runoff model for design flood estimation in gauged and ungauged catchments in southern Italy, by considering as input 500-years of 20-min synthetic rainfall data, derived from a daily rainfall generator and a specific downscaling procedure for Southern Italy. Previous studies primarily focused on precipitation and antecedent runoff as the inputs for runoff forecasting, however, less attention was paid to fully incorporate large-scale climate variables and other local-scale climate variables as the inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a return period, the alternating-block method combines in a single theoretical storm the most adverse statistics for several durations, which originally derive from different historical rainfall events. Conceptually, this is a worst-case-scenario storm ignoring actual rainfall patterns found in the rainfall registers, yielding to a volume overestimation (Di Baldassarre et al, 2006). For the aggregated Gamma storm, differences with regard to the continuous model are more limited, in all cases, which supports the conclusion of having generated a synthetic storm that not only reproduces peak intensities properly but also respects the observed temporal patterns and, consequently, reproduces better storm volumes.…”
Section: Comparison With the Alternating-block Design Stormmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…One of the downsides of this process is the fact that it ignores, in its approach, aspects relative to the actual duration and structure -or inner pattern -of intensities of rain, visible in high-resolution rainfall registers. In some countries, automatic pluviometer networks have been working for decades and thus, detailed information is now available, allowing engineers to undertake such matters with statistical representativity (De Luca, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%