2002
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and performance of a predictor‐multicorrector Time Discontinuous Galerkin method in non‐linear elastodynamics

Abstract: SUMMARYA predictor-multicorrector implementation of a Time Discontinuous Galerkin method for non-linear dynamic analysis is described. This implementation is intended to limit the high computational expense typically required by implicit Time Discontinuous Galerkin methods, without degrading their accuracy and stability properties. The algorithm is analysed with reference to conservative Du ng oscillators for which closed-form solutions are available. Therefore, insight into the accuracy and stability properti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, displacement and velocity are approximated as in the classical formulation, see Equations (24) and (25), while the approximations used for the test functions are formally analogous to those given in Equations (26) and (27), with the exception that now W is a matrix of ( p −1)-order polynomial functions. Based on these assumptions, the energy corrected TDG formulation in the typical time step can be rewritten in the same form of Equations (28) and (29) of the classical 331 formulation, by simply replacing R, W, e, P and F with, respectively,R,Ŵ,ê,P andF defined as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, displacement and velocity are approximated as in the classical formulation, see Equations (24) and (25), while the approximations used for the test functions are formally analogous to those given in Equations (26) and (27), with the exception that now W is a matrix of ( p −1)-order polynomial functions. Based on these assumptions, the energy corrected TDG formulation in the typical time step can be rewritten in the same form of Equations (28) and (29) of the classical 331 formulation, by simply replacing R, W, e, P and F with, respectively,R,Ŵ,ê,P andF defined as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both pendula and spring-pendula were studied theoretically, numerically and experimentally in the context of time integration and dynamic substructuring [32,33]. The emulated or uncoupled case is considered in this section.…”
Section: The Spring-pendulum Oscillator: the Uncoupled Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that systems including pendula may exhibit large amplitude subharmonic and chaotic motions as well as simple periodic behaviour [22,31]. Both pendula and spring-pendula were studied theoretically, numerically and experimentally in the context of time integration and dynamic substructuring [32,33]. The emulated or uncoupled case is considered in this section.…”
Section: The Spring-pendulum Oscillator: the Uncoupled Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While predictor-corrector Time Discontinuous Galerkin algorithms are not appealing in a PDT context owing to the evaluation of unknown extra displacement and velocity fields (Bursi and Mancuso, 2002;Bonelli et al, 2001Bonelli et al, , 2002b, the implementation of a predictor-multicorrector technique into the implicit CH-a method is feasible and is the main issue that the paper explores further. Therefore, the CH-a algorithm has been implemented in a predictor-corrector form, the IPC-r 1 method in short, without resorting to iterative schemes; and in view of advanced real-time applications also the explicit ECH-a method has been implemented in the PDT method: the EPC-r b scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%