2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-011-0278-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and prediction of indoor air pollutants in a subway station using a new key variable selection method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crowding, dwelling type, and proximity to major roads are reported as important predictors of PM 2.5 levels, and this also emerged in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Crowding, dwelling type, and proximity to major roads are reported as important predictors of PM 2.5 levels, and this also emerged in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, we observed that the gap between the wall and the roof and cross-ventilation also had a positive effect in the model. Crowding, dwelling type, and proximity to major roads are reported as important predictors of PM 2.5 levels, 8,[20][21][22] and this also emerged in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the prediction of PM concentrations in a subway station, both MLR and PLS models were used. 66 A comparison of the RMSE between the MLR and PLS models shows that the RMSE values for the PLS model are higher than those for the MLR for training, but lower for testing ( Figure 3). The RMSE values for training and testing are similar, indicating the robustness of the PLS models for the studied cases.…”
Section: Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 95%