2018
DOI: 10.3788/irla201847.1106009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and prediction of melt pool size in laser deposition manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 9, it could be deduced that the maximum cooling rate occurs between points A and B at the top of the molten pool, where the temperature is approximately 2780 • C and the cooling rate is approximately 3.8 × 10 6 • C/s, respectively; the maximum temperature occurs between the point C at the interface between the substrate and the molten layer, where the temperature is approximately 1753 • C and the cooling rate is approximately 8 × 10 5 • C/s, respectively. The melt pool temperature tends to decrease from top to bottom, and the cooling rate was found to be higher at the top of the melt pool and lower at the bottom of the melt pool, due to the obvious convective heat exchange arising on the surface of the melt pool and the obvious heat conduction occurring at the bottom [28]. Figure 10 depicts the distribution of the melt pool temperature gradient in different directions.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Cooling Rate And Temperature Gradient O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 9, it could be deduced that the maximum cooling rate occurs between points A and B at the top of the molten pool, where the temperature is approximately 2780 • C and the cooling rate is approximately 3.8 × 10 6 • C/s, respectively; the maximum temperature occurs between the point C at the interface between the substrate and the molten layer, where the temperature is approximately 1753 • C and the cooling rate is approximately 8 × 10 5 • C/s, respectively. The melt pool temperature tends to decrease from top to bottom, and the cooling rate was found to be higher at the top of the melt pool and lower at the bottom of the melt pool, due to the obvious convective heat exchange arising on the surface of the melt pool and the obvious heat conduction occurring at the bottom [28]. Figure 10 depicts the distribution of the melt pool temperature gradient in different directions.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Cooling Rate And Temperature Gradient O...mentioning
confidence: 99%