Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom

Abstract

Abstract. Simulation results of global aerosol models have been assembled in the framework of the AeroCom intercomparison exercise. In this paper, we analyze the life cycles of dust, sea salt, sulfate, black carbon and particulate organic matter as simulated by sixteen global aerosol models. The differences among the results (model diversities) for sources and sinks, burdens, particle sizes, water uptakes, and spatial dispersals have been established. These diversities have large consequences for the calculated radiative forcing and the aerosol concentrations at the surface. Processes and parameters are identified which deserve further research.The AeroCom all-models-average emissions are dominated by the mass of sea salt (SS), followed by dust (DU), sulfate (SO 4 ), particulate organic matter (POM), and finally black carbon (BC). Interactive parameterizations of the emissions and contrasting particles sizes of SS and DU lead genCorrespondence to: C. Textor (christiane.textor@cea.fr) erally to higher diversities of these species, and for total aerosol. The lower diversity of the emissions of the fine aerosols, BC, POM, and SO 4 , is due to the use of similar emission inventories, and does therefore not necessarily indicate a better understanding of their sources. The diversity of SO 4 -sources is mainly caused by the disagreement on depositional loss of precursor gases and on chemical production. The diversities of the emissions are passed on to the burdens, but the latter are also strongly affected by the model-specific treatments of transport and aerosol processes. The burdens of dry masses decrease from largest to smallest: DU, SS, SO 4 , POM, and BC.The all-models-average residence time is shortest for SS with about half a day, followed by SO 4 and DU with four days, and POM and BC with six and seven days, respectively. The wet deposition rate is controlled by the solubility and increases from DU, BC, POM to SO 4 and SS. It is the dominant sink for SO 4 , BC, and POM, and contributes about one third to the total removal of SS and DU species. For SS Published by Copernicus GmbH on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. C. Textor et al.: Diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroComand DU we find high diversities for the removal rate coefficients and deposition pathways. Models do neither agree on the split between wet and dry deposition, nor on that between sedimentation and other dry deposition processes. We diagnose an extremely high diversity for the uptake of ambient water vapor that influences the particle size and thus the sink rate coefficients. Furthermore, we find little agreement among the model results for the partitioning of wet removal into scavenging by convective and stratiform rain.Large differences exist for aerosol dispersal both in the vertical and in the horizontal direction. In some models, a minimum of total aerosol concentration is simulated at the surface. Aerosol dispersal is most pronounced for SO 4 and BC and lowest for SS. Diversities are higher for meridional than for verti...

Climate Feedback on Aerosol Emission and Atmospheric Concentrations

“…In turn, these processes depend to various degrees on meteorology and climate. Aerosol particles typically reside in the atmosphere few hours to about 2 weeks [11]. Changes in dust atmospheric residence time, e.g., due to wet removal processes or atmospheric static stability, will modify the distributions and concentrations of aerosol particles.…”

A pathway analysis of global aerosol processes

“…Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AERO-COM) is a community effort to intercompare global aerosol models and evaluate them against observations Schulz et al, 2006;Textor et al, 2006Textor et al, , 2007Koffi et al, 2012;Myhre et al, 2013;Samset et al, 2013;Stier et al, 2013). This work has led to many valuable insights into what models can and cannot do.…”

The impact of precipitation evaporation on the atmospheric aerosol distribution in EC-Earth v3.2.0

“…Climate models vary widely in their representation of aerosol processing (e.g. Textor et al, 2006). Differences found in model intercomparisons (e.g.…”

“…Textor et al, 2006;van Noije et al, 2014). Aerosols are incorporated in clouds and precipitation by nucleation and impaction scavenging (called in-cloud scavenging), and uptake by falling hydrometeors (called below-cloud scavenging).…”