2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and selection of optimal solvent-based technologies for biogas upgrading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…methanol, N-methyl pyrrolidone), while chemical scrubbing process (CSP) exploits the reversible reaction of solvent (e.g. mono-and diethanolamine) and the absorbed substances [15,18]. By HPWS and OPS, efficient H 2 S removal can also be managed.…”
Section: Biogas Composition and Conventional Physicochemical Upgradin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…methanol, N-methyl pyrrolidone), while chemical scrubbing process (CSP) exploits the reversible reaction of solvent (e.g. mono-and diethanolamine) and the absorbed substances [15,18]. By HPWS and OPS, efficient H 2 S removal can also be managed.…”
Section: Biogas Composition and Conventional Physicochemical Upgradin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This significantly overshadows chemical absorption, the state-ofthe-art technology for CO 2 capture, as bio-CH 4 is delivered at low pressures requiring high bio-CH 4 -compression duty before its injection into the natural gas grid, along with excessive thermal energy demand for solvent regeneration. 10 The T h i s c o n t e n t i s preference for water-scrubbing over membranes is attributed to its lower bio-CH 4 slip (i.e., 2% vs 20%), lower operating pressure (P abs < 1.0 MPa), and the absence of feed pretreatment stages, added to protect membranes from biogas impurities (i.e., H 2 S, siloxane, NH 3 ). As mature as it may seem at this stage, water-scrubbing remains lacking in several aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a total of 606 commissioned biogas upgrading plants in IEA-Bioenergy European member countries, ∼30% employ water-scrubbing, closely followed by membrane technology (28%) . This significantly overshadows chemical absorption, the state-of-the-art technology for CO 2 capture, as bio-CH 4 is delivered at low pressures requiring high bio-CH 4 -compression duty before its injection into the natural gas grid, along with excessive thermal energy demand for solvent regeneration . The preference for water-scrubbing over membranes is attributed to its lower bio-CH 4 slip (i.e., 2% vs 20%), lower operating pressure ( P abs < 1.0 MPa), and the absence of feed pretreatment stages, added to protect membranes from biogas impurities (i.e., H 2 S, siloxane, NH 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to obtain biomethane, biogas upgrading-a process of removing CO 2 -is required. Currently, six main upgrading techniques are used: water scrubbing, physical scrubbing, chemical scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption, membrane technology, and cryogenic separation, all well-analyzed by Carranza-Abid et al [6]. Further, when CO 2 is separated from biomethane, various carbon capture and storage techniques and more sustainable carbon capture and utilization techniques have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%