2015
DOI: 10.1051/proc/201448017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and simulation of rare events for SPDEs

Abstract: Abstract. In this work, we consider the numerical estimation of the probability for a stochastic process to hit a set B before reaching another set A. This event is assumed to be rare. We consider reactive trajectories of the stochastic Allen-Cahn partial differential evolution equation (with double well potential) in dimension 1. Reactive trajectories are defined as the probability distribution of the trajectories of a stochastic process, conditioned by the event of hitting B before A. We investigate the use … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is why naive Monte Carlo methods will not give reliable estimates of (2). We refer for example to [3,10] for some examples in the context of molecular simulation.…”
Section: Motivation and Mathematical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why naive Monte Carlo methods will not give reliable estimates of (2). We refer for example to [3,10] for some examples in the context of molecular simulation.…”
Section: Motivation and Mathematical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, unbiasedness of the unbiased AMS algorithm is not restricted to the estimation of the probability: it also provides information about the so-called reactive trajectories, see for instance [13] for preliminary simulations for the stochastic Allen-Cahn equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic Allen-Cahn equation is also a popular model for the study and simulation of rare events in infinite dimensional stochastic system, see for instance [8,47,58,59].…”
Section: Charles-edouard Bréhier and Ludovic Goudenègementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of Method 2, given by the scheme (9), is motivated by [49]. Finally, the definition of Method 3 is motivated by [8]. We have checked that the three variants give consistent results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%