2014
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Visualization of Complex Macroevolutionary Dynamics: An Example from Australian Scincid Lizards

Abstract: The correlation between species diversification and morphological evolution has long been of interest in evolutionary biology. We investigated the relationship between these processes during the radiation of 250+scincid lizards that constitute Australia's most species-rich clade of terrestrial vertebrates. We generated a time-calibrated phylogenetic tree for the group that was more than 85% complete at the species level and collected multivariate morphometric data for 183 species. We reconstructed the dynamics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
274
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
274
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the history of the Teloschistaceae and the other families is emphasized by macroevolutionary cohort analysis (Fig. 2B), which summarizes the extent to which any two species share a common macroevolutionary rate dynamic (36). The three tropical families and the family Teloschistaceae behave in general as two separate macroevolutionary cohorts with high probability (a clade within the Xanthorioideae in the Teloschistaceae providing a mild exception to this rule; depicted by red branches in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difference between the history of the Teloschistaceae and the other families is emphasized by macroevolutionary cohort analysis (Fig. 2B), which summarizes the extent to which any two species share a common macroevolutionary rate dynamic (36). The three tropical families and the family Teloschistaceae behave in general as two separate macroevolutionary cohorts with high probability (a clade within the Xanthorioideae in the Teloschistaceae providing a mild exception to this rule; depicted by red branches in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even without a firm species concept in prokaryotes (24), comparative phylogenetic methods provide insights into processes of lineage diversification and adaptation because they can test the null hypothesis that diversification occurs at a constant rate under a coalescent model (25,26). For our thaumarchaeotal data, diversification tests based on the γ-statistic reject a rate-constant pure birth model (γ = −4.03; P = 8 × 10 Use of a recently developed Bayesian method, Bayesian Analysis of Mixture Models (BAMM), which explicitly models variation in diversification rates across a tree (13)(14)(15), also provided strong support for heterogeneity in thaumarchaeotal diversification rates ( Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pH has a major impact on the ecology of extant Thaumarchaeota (9), we postulated that this environmental variable contributed to the thaumarchaeotal diversification regime. We therefore reconstructed rates of pH adaptation across thaumarchaeotal evolution in the BAMM framework (13)(14)(15). Our reconstructions of adaptation were based on estimates of pH preference of extant Thaumarchaeota, considered as the pH of the soil from which the amoA sequences were isolated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods provide separate estimates for speciation and extinction rates through time and relax the assumption of constant diversification rates by allowing either discrete changes in rates at estimated points in time [16] or continuous changes through time [17]. We also performed Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures [19], which allows shifts in rates among/within clades, but has the disadvantage of treating extinction as constant. All of these methods allow for diversification rates to be negative, that is to say periods of declining diversity, and account for undersampled phylogenies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%