1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00239623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis, classification, and coding of multielectrode spike trains with hidden Markov models

Abstract: It is shown that hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a powerful tool in the analysis of multielectrode data. This is demonstrated for a 30-electrode measurement of neuronal spike activity in the monkey's visual cortex during the application of different visual stimuli. HMMs with optimized parameters code the information contained in the spatiotemporal discharge patterns as a probabilistic function of a Markov process and thus provide abstract dynamical models of the pattern-generating process. We compare HMMs obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular our focus is on the process of determining from which neuron, out of an unknown number of neurons, each action potential arose based on action potential waveshape alone. In doing so we overlook the problem of spike detection and instead refer readers to Radons et al (1994) for treatment of that topic. Additionally we ignore the problem of detecting overlapping spikes (deconvolving coincident action potentials) here referring readers to the work of Fee et al (1996) and Görür et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular our focus is on the process of determining from which neuron, out of an unknown number of neurons, each action potential arose based on action potential waveshape alone. In doing so we overlook the problem of spike detection and instead refer readers to Radons et al (1994) for treatment of that topic. Additionally we ignore the problem of detecting overlapping spikes (deconvolving coincident action potentials) here referring readers to the work of Fee et al (1996) and Görür et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central idea of this dynamical systems approach [36,40,[72][73][74][75][76][77] is that the responses of different neurons reflect different views of a common dynamical process, whose effective dimensionality is much smaller than the number of neurons involved. While the neural trajectory might evolve differently on different trials, the commonalities among trajectories provide clues about properties that do not vary from trial-to-trial.…”
Section: Statistical Methods For Overcoming/exploiting Trial-to-trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamical systems approach has been previously applied to simultaneous spike trains in cat [73] and monkey [72] visual cortex. In those studies, the neural responses were driven on a moment-by-moment basis by visual stimuli.…”
Section: Statistical Methods For Overcoming/exploiting Trial-to-trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using hidden Markov models to capture the temporal dynamics with discrete states has also proven useful for neural data analysis [10], [11], [12] A combination of statespace dynamics and a discrete state was shown to capture population responses [13]. In any case, as with purely unsupervised models, there is no guarantee that a state-space model representation, either continuous or discrete, is useful in distinguishing different conditions.…”
Section: A Learning Low-dimensional Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%