SAE Technical Paper Series 2015
DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-2804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis Lead Drivability Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method that can quantitatively evaluate the driveability of heavy vehicles was proposed [8]. Walters et al evaluated the driveability of vehicles through the co-simulation method of the complex engine model and the vehicle dynamics model [9]. Lakshmanan et al proposed a subjective and objective evaluation method for the driveability of commercial vehicles [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method that can quantitatively evaluate the driveability of heavy vehicles was proposed [8]. Walters et al evaluated the driveability of vehicles through the co-simulation method of the complex engine model and the vehicle dynamics model [9]. Lakshmanan et al proposed a subjective and objective evaluation method for the driveability of commercial vehicles [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the information redundancy between objective indicators has not been considered. For the objective scoring models and methods, 24 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), 25 gray relational analysis (GRA), 26 and FCE 21 have good subjective and objective consistency for a single working condition, but their accuracy is limited and the different working condition types have a great influence on its evaluation accuracy. Based on learning methods, BP neural network 27 and optimal extreme learning machine (OELM) 21 can improve the consistency of subjective and objective to 95%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%