2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis, occurrence and removal efficiencies of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in sludge undergoing anaerobic digestion followed by diverse thermal treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present work has demonstrated that a pyrolysis temperature of 500 • C is likely sufficient to remove nearly 100% of the PCDD/Fs and PCBs from sewage sludge and other organic waste feedstocks. In parallel studies, removal efficiencies of > 99.5% were reported for organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in the DSS-1 and LSS feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500-600 • C [8] and > 98.3% for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (30 PFAS congeners) in the DSS-1, DSS-2, FWR, and LSS feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500-800 • C [54]. Together, these studies demonstrate that organic contaminants are likely to be volatilized/decomposed from the solid phase in industrially relevant pyrolysis systems where temperatures exceed 500 • C. Considering the relatively high thermal stability of the compounds investigated (PCDD/Fs, PCBs, OPFRs and PFAS), it is likely that other emerging organic contaminants, such as phthalates, bisphenols and brominated flame retardants also will be removed from the solid matrix in similar pyrolysis systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present work has demonstrated that a pyrolysis temperature of 500 • C is likely sufficient to remove nearly 100% of the PCDD/Fs and PCBs from sewage sludge and other organic waste feedstocks. In parallel studies, removal efficiencies of > 99.5% were reported for organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in the DSS-1 and LSS feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500-600 • C [8] and > 98.3% for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (30 PFAS congeners) in the DSS-1, DSS-2, FWR, and LSS feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500-800 • C [54]. Together, these studies demonstrate that organic contaminants are likely to be volatilized/decomposed from the solid phase in industrially relevant pyrolysis systems where temperatures exceed 500 • C. Considering the relatively high thermal stability of the compounds investigated (PCDD/Fs, PCBs, OPFRs and PFAS), it is likely that other emerging organic contaminants, such as phthalates, bisphenols and brominated flame retardants also will be removed from the solid matrix in similar pyrolysis systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve uncertainties related to the removal of persistent organic pollutants from organic waste by pyrolysis, several lab-scale studies have been performed [12,44,6]. Recent work also documented the first decomposition data and emission factors for per and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) and organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) from waste fractions during pyrolysis in a full-scale relevant pyrolysis unit [8,54]. Efforts have, furthermore, been made to explore ways to reduce PAH generation during pyrolysis, including the use of N 2 or CO 2 atmospheres and heteroatomic doping with non-metallic elements [31,32], metal catalyst addition [42], and technological modifications of pyrolizer units [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention time in the pyrolysis reactor was 20 min for all feedstocks and treatments except the DWSS, which was run at 40 min due to technical challenges. Pyrolysis temperature was considered the main treatment variable and was varied between 500 and 800 • C. The lower temperature threshold, 500 • C, was selected in order to ensure efficient decomposition of organic contaminants in the waste feedstocks [44,[46][47][48]. The upper threshold, 800 • C, was the maximum temperature achievable with the Biogreen ® technology at the time of operation.…”
Section: Pyrolysis Technology and Operational Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPFRs are registered as large volume manufacturing chemicals and have become ubiquitous in the environment, present in various sources such as wastewater [ 3 , 14 ], surface water [ 14 , 15 ], groundwater [ 16 ], seas/oceans [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], sludge [ 20 ], sediment [ 21 ], soil [ 22 ], to drinking water [ 14 , 23 ], household dust [ 24 ], humans [ 25 , 26 ], and other aquatic and terrestrial organisms [ 27 , 28 ]. Numerous studies have potential health issues associated with the presence of OPFRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%