NO 3؊ uptake by plant roots is rapidly inhibited by exposure to NH 4 ؉ . The rapidity of the effect has led to the presumption that the inhibition results from the direct effects of NH 4 ؉ at the plasma membrane. The mechanism of this inhibition, however, has been in contention. In the present study we used the radiotracer 13 N to determine the relative effects of short-term exposures to NH 4 ؉ on the 13 4 ؉ inhibition of influx was mediated via effects on the inducible high-affinity transport system rather than on the constitutive high-affinity transport system or the low-affinity transport system. Exposure to NH 4 ؉ also caused increased NO 3 ؊ efflux; the largest effect was at low external [NO 3 ؊ ] in uninduced plants. In absolute terms, the reduction of influx made the dominant contribution to the observed reduction of net uptake of NO 3 ؊ . Differences in response between plants induced with NO 3 ؊ and those induced with NO 2 ؊ indicate that NO 2 ؊ may not be an appropriate analog for NO 3 ؊ under all conditions.The inhibitory effects exerted by the NH 4 ϩ ion upon NO 3 Ϫ uptake by the roots of higher plants have been studied extensively (Weissman, 1950;Lycklama, 1963; Fried et al., 1965;Minotti et al., 1969;Jackson et al., 1976; Rao and Rains, 1976; Doddema and Telkamp, 1979;MacKown et al., 1982a; Deane-Drummond and Glass, 1983; Rufty et al., 1983; Breteler and Siegerist, 1984; Glass et al., 1985; Ingemarsson et al., 1987; Oscarson et al., 1987;Lee and Drew, 1989; Warner and Huffaker, 1989; de la Haba et al., 1990; Ayling, 1993; Aslam et al., 1994 Aslam et al., , 1997 Chaillou et al., 1994). It is evident that there are short-term effects of NH 4 ϩ on NO 3 Ϫ uptake that are presumed to result from the direct effects of NH 4 ϩ on the plasma membrane; these short-term effects are apparent within minutes of exposure to NH 4 ϩ . Moreover, longer-term effects due to NH 4 ϩ and/or assimilation products of NH 4 ϩ are thought to operate at the transcriptional level (Glass and Siddiqi, 1995;Krapp et al., 1998; Zhuo et al., 1999).Despite the efforts of many investigators, a lack of consensus persists concerning the mechanism(s) responsible for the short-term inhibition of NO 3 Ϫ uptake by NH 4 ϩ ; specifically, whether the NH 4 ϩ effect is achieved by the direct inhibition of influx or by stimulating efflux. Although early reports suggested that NH 4 ϩ enhanced NO 3 Ϫ efflux (Jackson et al., 1976; Doddema and Telkamp, 1979;MacKown et al., 1982a; Deane-Drummond and Glass, 1983; Deane-Drummond, 1985, 1986, later studies using 13 NO 3 Ϫ clearly documented an inhibition of influx (Glass et al., 1985;Lee and Clarkson, 1986; Ingemarsson et al., 1987; Oscarson et al., 1987;Lee and Drew, 1989; Ayling, 1993;King et al., 1993). The debate has recently been revived by Aslam and coworkers (1994, 1997), who concluded that the main effect of NH 4 ϩ on net NO 3 Ϫ uptake was through stimulation of NO 3 Ϫ efflux; they discounted the significance of influx inhibition. A resolution of this controversy has ...