2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of 2D-gel images for detection of protein spots using a novel non-separable wavelet based method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it has been shown that the performance of Delta2D improves with increased noise . nIRFD images processed in Delta2D presented granular residual backgrounds to a greater extent than 37 μm densitometry images following automated background subtraction, corroborating that nIRFD‐imaged gel backgrounds were measurably less uniform (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, it has been shown that the performance of Delta2D improves with increased noise . nIRFD images processed in Delta2D presented granular residual backgrounds to a greater extent than 37 μm densitometry images following automated background subtraction, corroborating that nIRFD‐imaged gel backgrounds were measurably less uniform (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is possible that the measured decrease in 1DE S/N with 200 μm nIRFD may in part be attributed to the stain utilised, consistent with some signal from stained matrix despite the expectation that primarily only protein‐bound CBB should fluoresce . Again, however, evidence suggests that poor S/N would not have so negatively impacted Delta2D analysis , indicating that low image resolution was the primary cause of the decreased 2DE DS observed. Certainly, the Delta2D imaging guide (https://www.decodon.com) highlights the need for adequate image resolution for optimal analysis outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2-DGE images inevitably exhibit anomalies caused by sample preparation techniques and the imaging system used to acquire the digital images [22] . The most common anomalies in 2-DGE images are oversaturated, faint, or fuzzy spots, vertical and horizontal streaking, overlapping spots, and noise [13] , [23] . Figure 1 shows a 2-DGE image with the most common anomalies.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of 2-dge Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many computational applications are available for processing and analyzing 2-DGE images, such as MELANIE, PDQuest, Z3, Progenesis Workstation, ProteomeWeaver, ProteinMine, Delta2D, and DeCyder [12] , [13] . Given that one cell can express around ten thousand proteins, 2-DGE needs an effective computational tool that can process large volumes of information [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%