Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2020.t4i.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of 34 to 101GBaud submarine transmissions and performance prediction models

Abstract: We analyze more than 100 subsea experiments with various configurations of rates, modulations, powers, reach and show a format and rate agnostic, accurate QoT prediction tool. We particularly show the impact of signal droop and the connection between GAWBS models based on spectral measurements and system impact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different approach to droop behavior known as the generalized droop (GD) model was then proposed by several groups in which droop is included for all noise terms as well as the signal and the droop framework is applied on a spanby-span basis [16,17,[19][20][21][22]. Experimental transmission results with excellent agreement with the GD model have been demonstrated several times [16,[23][24][25][26]. When the GD model is applied in the study of power efficiency, optimal SNR values maximizing PE are different from the first droop model of [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach to droop behavior known as the generalized droop (GD) model was then proposed by several groups in which droop is included for all noise terms as well as the signal and the droop framework is applied on a spanby-span basis [16,17,[19][20][21][22]. Experimental transmission results with excellent agreement with the GD model have been demonstrated several times [16,[23][24][25][26]. When the GD model is applied in the study of power efficiency, optimal SNR values maximizing PE are different from the first droop model of [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition comes from the assumption that P p would be a better representation of the electrical power consumption than P O , since amplifiers output power typically follows an affine law with pump power in similar population inversion conditions, which depends on the transparency pump -power in which the amplifier starts to emit photons. 6 By considering P O in the PE definition, one neglects the contribution of the transparency pump, making the power efficiency prediction less accurate. It has been shown in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such long-haul and high-baud-rate systems operating at low channel powers, there are several impactful effects such as the generalized signal droop (GD) [1]- [2], [5]- [10] effect, transponder implementation penalty [11]- [13], and to smaller extents, nonlinear interference (NLI) [14]- [16] noise and Guided Acoustic Waveguide Brillouin Scattering (GAWBS) [9], [17]- [19] noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] an important quality of GD formalism was determined, namely that GD effectively removes a first-order perturbation assumption of the GN model, i.e., GD should be better suited for the highly non-linear power operation regime, compared to the standard SNR model. In [9] the impact of generalized droop non-inclusion was experimentally quantified in terms of residual noise power vs. distance for a variety of baud rates and modulation formats before GAWBS noise is included in the model. The conditions evaluated generally represented moderate channel powers and a range of SNRs corresponding to a wide range of transmission distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%