2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13351-020-9143-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a Convective Storm Crossing Poyang Lake in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PRE increased significantly while the change of GPP was not obvious, therefore, PUE showed a significant downward trend in 2003. Zou et al showed that, in 2007, there was little difference in PRE in spring and summer compared with the previous year, but in autumn and winter, there were rare autumn rains in the northern region, and PRE increased significantly, so PUE decreased (Zou et al, 2008). Compared with normal years, in 2011, China showed a situation of “flood in the north and drought in the south”, with more PRE, and at the same time, the temperature in the LP was 0.2°C lower than that of the previous year, which led to a small decrease in GPP, and therefore the PUE value fell to a valley.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PRE increased significantly while the change of GPP was not obvious, therefore, PUE showed a significant downward trend in 2003. Zou et al showed that, in 2007, there was little difference in PRE in spring and summer compared with the previous year, but in autumn and winter, there were rare autumn rains in the northern region, and PRE increased significantly, so PUE decreased (Zou et al, 2008). Compared with normal years, in 2011, China showed a situation of “flood in the north and drought in the south”, with more PRE, and at the same time, the temperature in the LP was 0.2°C lower than that of the previous year, which led to a small decrease in GPP, and therefore the PUE value fell to a valley.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the national annual average precipitation was higher than normal, and the distribution of precipitation was uneven.The average PRE in the LP in 2003 increased significantly compared with the previous consecutive drought years. The PRE increased significantly while the change of GPP was not obvious, therefore, PUE showed a significant downward trend in 2003.Zou et al showed that, in 2007, there was little difference in PRE in spring and summer compared with the previous year, but in autumn and winter, there were rare autumn rains in the northern region, and PRE increased significantly, so PUE decreased(Zou et al, 2008). Compared with normal years, in 2011, China showed a situation of "flood in the north and drought in the south", with more PRE, and at the same time, the temperature in the LP was 0.2 C lower than that of the previous year, which led to a small decrease in GPP, and therefore the PUE value fell to a valley.The average GPP, PRE, and PUE of vegetation in the LP from 2001 to 2018 had strong spatial heterogeneity (Figure3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, at night, the large lake-land temperature difference (the lake is warmer than land) can yield the land breeze with air flowing to lake from nearby land. e land breeze converges air over PL, resulting in ascending motion over PL, even maybe enhancing the crossing storm [36]. e evolution of the observed 2 m air temperature difference between Fengxin (far away from PL and Nanchang city) and Duchang (nearby PL) or Poyang (nearby PL) also shows that the sites nearby PL are cooler than the site far away from PL (Figure 9(b)), further confirming the PL as a cold source in daytime.…”
Section: Discussion On the Causes Of Diurnal Variations Of Gps Pwvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon not only occurs in large and deep lakes, but also in small and medium-sized lakes [21,22]. In addition, lakes will also affect the movement and intensity of the transit weather system, which will lead to changes in the temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%