2019
DOI: 10.9798/kosham.2019.19.2.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a Conventional Huff Model at Seoul Station and Proposal of an Improvisation Method

Abstract: The conventional Huff model has a serious limitation with respect to over-smoothing of the rainfall peak because it is derived based on the mean temporal distribution of observed rainfall events. To overcome this limitation of the conventional Huff model, this study proposes a modified Huff model that considers the characteristics of the temporal distribution of observed annual maximum rainfall events. After normalizing and rearranging rainfall events around the storm center, the modified Huff model is formula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference can be found from the lower rainfall peak, 28.7 mm/10 min (=172.4 mm/h). Lastly, we derived the second quartile 50% Huff model as it is found to be the most frequent pattern observed in Korea among the four types of Huff models [70][71][72]. Hence, the Huff model had a peak rainfall intensity ahead of the center of the storm duration with a value of 7.6 mm/10 min (=45.4 mm/h).…”
Section: Impact Of Rainfall Pattern On Slope Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference can be found from the lower rainfall peak, 28.7 mm/10 min (=172.4 mm/h). Lastly, we derived the second quartile 50% Huff model as it is found to be the most frequent pattern observed in Korea among the four types of Huff models [70][71][72]. Hence, the Huff model had a peak rainfall intensity ahead of the center of the storm duration with a value of 7.6 mm/10 min (=45.4 mm/h).…”
Section: Impact Of Rainfall Pattern On Slope Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second quartile of the Huff method was used for the synthetic rainfall distribution [47], following the method proposed by the Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (2011) [48]. The reason for using the second quartile is that in the estimation of flood quantity, if effective rainfall calculation method is used, much of the peak of the synthetic rainfall hyetograph is treated as a loss due to the initial loss impact in the initial first and second quartiles, so the flood quantity may be estimated to be relatively small [49].…”
Section: Generation Of Synthetic Rainfall Datamentioning
confidence: 99%