2014
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2013.2269054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a Cooperative Strategy for a Large Decentralized Wireless Network

Abstract: Abstract-This paper investigates the benefits of cooperation and proposes a relay activation strategy for a large wireless network with multiple transmitters. In this framework, some nodes cooperate with a nearby node that acts as a relay, using the decode-and-forward protocol, and others use direct transmission. The network is modeled as an independently marked Poisson point process and the source nodes may choose their relays from the set of inactive nodes. Although cooperation can potentially lead to signif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the first hop location and channel knowledge, the work [11] considered the selection of the closest relay to the source in order to relay the messages to the destination. In [12], the optimum relay activation probability was analyzed when relays were selected based on their distances to the source node. In [13], a random relay selection policy choosing a relay in an area around the source-destination mid-point was proposed and its outage was compared with the nearest-neighbor relay selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the first hop location and channel knowledge, the work [11] considered the selection of the closest relay to the source in order to relay the messages to the destination. In [12], the optimum relay activation probability was analyzed when relays were selected based on their distances to the source node. In [13], a random relay selection policy choosing a relay in an area around the source-destination mid-point was proposed and its outage was compared with the nearest-neighbor relay selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…τ ) 1 { s(X)≤T } N = n ] = nPr { s (U ≤ T )},where U is a generic random variable uniformly distributed over B (0, τ ). Using this observation, we can write µ (T, τ ) as µ (T, τ ) = λπτ 2 Pr { s (U ) ≤ T } (12). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work can be extended to model interference in more complicated propagation environments, including those with a probabilistically parametrized LOS and NLOS channel model, and to more heterogeneous network deployment such as those involving relaying nodes [13]- [15].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without considering any time-scale separation between fading and relay location processes, they also studied the outage performance of both random and best relay selections from this QoS region. In [9], the optimum relay activation probability was analyzed for decodeand-forward (DF) relays selected based on their distances to the source node. In [10], the outage probability was analyzed with imperfect channel state information (CSI) when the relay having the best channel to the destination is selected to forward messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%