2012
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/15/4/042031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a pico tubular-type hydro turbine performance by runner blade shape using CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the tables, apart from the abbreviations already encountered, N T refers to the turbine shaft rotational speed, N the ideal or expected speed of the alternator shaft, % loss the percentage difference between the actual and ideal alternator shaft speeds and P the computed power. Figure 6 to 8 confirm the general expectation that the alternator shaft speed (N A ) improves with increasing flow rate, a function of flow area, which favors the development of higher torques (Edeoja et al 2016a, Derakhshan and Kasaiean 2012, Park et al 2012, von Flotow 2012, Smith and Bush 2010. Also, it has been shown for this system that N A increases with the number of blades (NOB) before deteriorating after about 10 to 12 blades (Edeoja et al 2016c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In the tables, apart from the abbreviations already encountered, N T refers to the turbine shaft rotational speed, N the ideal or expected speed of the alternator shaft, % loss the percentage difference between the actual and ideal alternator shaft speeds and P the computed power. Figure 6 to 8 confirm the general expectation that the alternator shaft speed (N A ) improves with increasing flow rate, a function of flow area, which favors the development of higher torques (Edeoja et al 2016a, Derakhshan and Kasaiean 2012, Park et al 2012, von Flotow 2012, Smith and Bush 2010. Also, it has been shown for this system that N A increases with the number of blades (NOB) before deteriorating after about 10 to 12 blades (Edeoja et al 2016c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Also, it was highest for the largest nozzle diameter and least for the smallest diameter, affirming that higher number of blades and larger nozzle diameters [49,56]. The variation of the shaft power was highly significant statistically at 0.05 level along the columns (nozzle diameter) confirming the relevance of the effect of the parameter in generating the shaft power required to produce the necessary torques [62,79,87].…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The shaft power increases with an increase in nozzle diameter and was highest in the turbine with 11 blades with a value of about 2100 W. This is because this parameter depends on the turbine speeds developed. Generally, the higher number of blades precipitated higher values of shaft power [95,96].…”
Section: Penstockmentioning
confidence: 99%