2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09489-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a Real-Time Capable Cable Force Computation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For computation, several methods exist that are commonly known. They differ, e.g., in the required maximum or average computation time or in the resulting force level [1,22].…”
Section: Forces and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For computation, several methods exist that are commonly known. They differ, e.g., in the required maximum or average computation time or in the resulting force level [1,22].…”
Section: Forces and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Section 3.2, a force calculation method is needed to check for a feasible solution of Equation (4). In the following, the puncture method [20] was used for this purpose. If this method found a feasible solution, the according cable forces were set in the next simulation step.…”
Section: Evaluation For Redundancy R =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is solved in [34], [35] where the 2-norm and barycenter tension distributions are calculated with a relatively high but bounded worst-case complexity. Besides, the methods in [36]- [39] make simple, fast and predictable computations suitable for degrees of redundancy larger than two or three. However, these methods are not proved to work in the whole WFW [38] and they may not be effective for suspended CDPRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are not proved to work in the whole WFW [38] and they may not be effective for suspended CDPRs. To enlarge the part of the WFW in which they work, some cable tensions are set at their maximum or minimum admissible values, which may be contrary to the desired behavior and degrade the smoothness of the tension time evolutions (see the example in [39]). Furthermore, a general issue is the exact nature of the computed solution which cannot be chosen, e.g., no optimality criterion can be assigned to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation