PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED INTERNET AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 2018
DOI: 10.20544/aiit2018.p06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Accessibility of the e-Learning Platforms According to the WCAG 2.0 Standard Compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, we analyze five Learning Management Systems (Moodle, Eliademy, Docebo, Sakai and Atutor) that are most used by the community according to Gartner, which does not mean that they are the best for all e-learning areas. We aimed to analyse the accessibility of LMSs for people with disabilities considering the criteria with different levels of compliance in accordance with the WCAG 2.0 standard [5]. We realize that each of the analysed LMSs is with unique features.…”
Section: Cross4all E-learning System For Increasing Health Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, we analyze five Learning Management Systems (Moodle, Eliademy, Docebo, Sakai and Atutor) that are most used by the community according to Gartner, which does not mean that they are the best for all e-learning areas. We aimed to analyse the accessibility of LMSs for people with disabilities considering the criteria with different levels of compliance in accordance with the WCAG 2.0 standard [5]. We realize that each of the analysed LMSs is with unique features.…”
Section: Cross4all E-learning System For Increasing Health Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was expanded in accordance with the additional demands of WCAG 2.1 standard, which includes 17 new success criteria: five for Level A, seven for Level AA and five for Level AAA of compliance. Most of the criteria are fulfilled [6]. The comparison tables can be seen at [5,6] as well as the explanation why the ATutor platform is chosen.…”
Section: Cross4all E-learning System For Increasing Health Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moodle is a LMS with open-source platform modules customized according to user needs [39]. Furthermore, it features dashboards, learner tracking, and multimedia support; and it allows creating a mobile-friendly application through integrating third-party add-ons [40]. Nonetheless, the faculty have still little knowledge and moderate competence on the use of Moodle.…”
Section: Knowledge and Competence On And In The Use Of Lmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technologies are/will be used for improving learning tools that have been a rapidly evolving topic area and will be in future. For example, Bocevska et al (2018) defined a personalized learning method as a part of LMS improvement that refers to a variety of learning experiences, approaches and strategies for addressing various learning needs, aspirations, interest and backgrounds of individual learners, through the use of data generated by the learners' activities. Whereas Zanjani et al (2017) investigated the LMS design determinants that impact user engagement with LMS tools in higher education.…”
Section: Aim and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%