2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20226498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers

Abstract: There are several known cases of positioning error, leading to serious consequences, sometimes also deadly. Therefore, obtaining accurate position data by means of GPS receivers is paramount. With this perspective, the aim of this study was to test the within-field accuracy of different types of GPS receivers, and to determine their reliability. A proprietary software was used to determine the positioning accuracy of nine different types of satellite receivers. In addition, their reliability was investigated, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar operational analysis, but based on the example of GPS receivers, has been conducted and described in [24]. The obtained result, i.e., a ~99.88% probability for a system to stay in the state of full fitness throughout a year, means that the centralized video surveillance system exhibits availability similar to that of other complementary railway systems [25][26][27], e.g., the GSM-R network (99.95), with 10.5 h downtime per year. Due to the scale and complexity of the system, this is a good result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A similar operational analysis, but based on the example of GPS receivers, has been conducted and described in [24]. The obtained result, i.e., a ~99.88% probability for a system to stay in the state of full fitness throughout a year, means that the centralized video surveillance system exhibits availability similar to that of other complementary railway systems [25][26][27], e.g., the GSM-R network (99.95), with 10.5 h downtime per year. Due to the scale and complexity of the system, this is a good result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A similar approach was presented by the main co-author in [7,[26][27][28][29]. Applying the presented approach to the assessment and analysis of other systems by assessing reliability or risk, as presented in the works [30][31][32], is also expected. To use the modeling presented here in various other types of technical system assessments, such as diagnostics [33], risk assessment related to road and rail signaling [27,34], and development-related applications [35], seems possible too.…”
Section: Iq Measurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…4) Comparison with other Localization Technologies: The power consumption of GNSS modules ranges from 12-72 mW for super-low-power modules [54] to 160 mW in a typical smartphone [55]. The accuracy of GPS receivers is about 2.5 m for high-end receivers [56], 2-5 m in smartphones [57], and at least centimeter-level for real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS [58]. Therefore, UWB devices can provide significantly higher localization accuracy indoors than GNSS receivers without enhancements; in terms of power consumption, LRP devices are comparable to super-low-power GNSS receivers, while the average power consumption of HRP devices exceeds the one of GNSS receivers in smartphones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%