2003
DOI: 10.5194/we-4-1-2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of adaptive foraging in an intraguild predation system

Abstract: An intraguild predation (IGP) system with adaptive foraging behavior was analyzed using a simple mathematical model. The main aim was to explore how the adaptive behavior affects species interactions as well as how such interactions derived from adaptive behavior affect community stability. The focal system contained top predators, intermediate predators, and basal prey. Intermediate predators exhibit antipredator behavior and balance costs (e.g. perceived predation risk) and benefits (e.g. resource i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely that provided intra-guild predation is a feasible trophic mode and there exists an optimal foraging effort for the intra-guild prey, adaptive behaviour will always drive the system towards stability (although whether stability is actually reached is not assured). It is noteworthy that while the adaptive behaviour of the omnivore exerts some control on the stability of tri-trophic systems [28], our results and others [29,30] suggest that the adaptive behaviour of the seemingly most vulnerable member of the tri-trophic food web exerts a strong control on the dynamics of such systems. The underlying mechanism appears to be the ability of adaptive behaviour to buffer the system from rapid fluctuations, damping out largeamplitude oscillations and bringing a semblance of stability to the system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely that provided intra-guild predation is a feasible trophic mode and there exists an optimal foraging effort for the intra-guild prey, adaptive behaviour will always drive the system towards stability (although whether stability is actually reached is not assured). It is noteworthy that while the adaptive behaviour of the omnivore exerts some control on the stability of tri-trophic systems [28], our results and others [29,30] suggest that the adaptive behaviour of the seemingly most vulnerable member of the tri-trophic food web exerts a strong control on the dynamics of such systems. The underlying mechanism appears to be the ability of adaptive behaviour to buffer the system from rapid fluctuations, damping out largeamplitude oscillations and bringing a semblance of stability to the system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For instance, the effect of adaptive behaviour has been shown to stabilize linear food chains [22] and to promote the coexistence of competing predators [23] and prey [24] and have a general stabilizing effect on food webs [25][26][27]. With regard to intra-guild predation, adaptive, fitness-seeking behaviour of intra-guild predator yields a relatively small effect in facilitating coexistence [28], whereas the effect of adaptive behaviour of the intra-guild prey appears to be more pronounced [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the complex of Col. maculata , Har. Nevertheless, predator facilitation may be rare in the fi eld, since three key elements are required for this interaction: other interactions such as cannibalism, of a temporal sequence of predators, of refuges, of anti -predatory mechanisms, or others (Okuyama & Ruyle 2003, Kindlmann & Houdkova 2006, Amarasekare 2007, Borer et al 2007, Holt & Huxel 2007, Janssen et al 2007, Rudolf 2007. Nevertheless, predator facilitation may be rare in the fi eld, since three key elements are required for this interaction: other interactions such as cannibalism, of a temporal sequence of predators, of refuges, of anti -predatory mechanisms, or others (Okuyama & Ruyle 2003, Kindlmann & Houdkova 2006, Amarasekare 2007, Borer et al 2007, Holt & Huxel 2007, Janssen et al 2007, Rudolf 2007.…”
Section: Facilitation and B Iocontrolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phenotypic plasticity or evolution) is now recognized as a major ecological factor that significantly influences population and thus community dynamics in ways that can facilitate species coexistence (Abrams 2000, Bolker et al 2003, Werner and Peacor 2003, Hairston et al 2005). This potential coexistence facilitation mechanism has been increasingly incorporated into IGP studies (foraging adaptation of IG predator; Křivan 2000, Křivan and Diehl 2005, foraging‐defense adaptation by IG prey; Okuyama and Ruyle 2003, defense adaptation by basal prey; Kimbrell et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%