Deep shale reservoirs with burial
depths of >3500 m are now the
target of gas producing intervals in the Sichuan Basin, China. Due
to the in situ high temperatures and pressures, methane
in deep shale formations is supercritical, resulting in the inapplicability
of some conventional adsorption models. To determine the methane adsorption
capacity of deep shale and its influencing factors, different shale
lithofacies from the Dongxi area of the southeastern Sichuan Basin
are investigated and compared in this work. The nanopore structure
of Wufeng (WF) and Longmaxi (LMX) gas shales are characterized using
gas (nitrogen and carbon dioxide) physisorption and high-resolution
scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methane isothermal adsorption
experiments are carried out on typical shale samples at different
temperatures (from 30 to 90 °C) and pressures (up to 32 MPa).
The excess adsorption data are fitted by the supercritical Dubinin–Radushkevich
(SDR) model, and the dominant influencing factors of methane adsorption
in deep marine shale are determined. Four shale lithofacies are recognized
in the study area, including silica-rich argillaceous shale (CM-1),
siliceous shale (S), clay-rich siliceous shale (S-3), and argillaceous–siliceous
mixed shale (M-2). Nanoscale organic matter (OM) pores, often in irregular,
angular and flat shapes, are the dominant pore types in the WF and
LMX shale samples. Generally, the pore size spectrum of OM pores is
shale lithofacies dependent, e.g., 10–160 nm for S shale and
10–120 nm for CM-1 shale. Compared to other shale lithofacies,
S shale exhibits the highest methane adsorption capacity, followed
by M-2 shale, while CM-1 shale has the smallest methane adsorption
capacity. The adsorption capacity of methane for deep WF and LMX shales
is positively correlated with the total organic carbon (TOC) content,
micropore volume, and micropore specific surface area. Absolute methane
adsorption capacity of deep shale increases with the increase of pressure,
but it will decrease at a higher temperature due to the negative and
predominant effect of temperature on methane adsorption. The higher
TOC content and more abundant small-sized pores promote the S shale
to have the strongest adsorption capacity for methane molecules; this
indicates that S shale is the most beneficial shale lithofacies for
gas adsorption.