Analysis of aerosol effects on warm clouds over the Yangtze River Delta from multi-sensor satellite observations

Abstract

Abstract. Aerosol effects on low warm clouds over the Yangtze River Delta (YRD, eastern China) are examined using co-located MODIS, CALIOP and CloudSat observations. By taking the vertical locations of aerosol and cloud layers into account, we use simultaneously observed aerosol and cloud data to investigate relationships between cloud properties and the amount of aerosol particles (using aerosol optical depth, AOD, as a proxy). Also, we investigate the impact of aerosol types on the variation of cloud properties with AOD. Finally, we explore how meteorological conditions affect these relationships using ERA-Interim reanalysis data. This study shows that the relation between cloud properties and AOD depends on the aerosol abundance, with a different behaviour for low and high AOD (i.e. AOD < 0.35 and AOD > 0.35). This applies to cloud droplet effective radius (CDR) and cloud fraction (CF), but not to cloud optical thickness (COT) and cloud top pressure (CTP). COT is found to decrease when AOD increases, which may be due to radiative effects and retrieval artefacts caused by absorbing aerosol. Conversely, CTP tends to increase with elevated AOD, indicating that the aerosol is not always prone to expand the vertical extension. It also shows that the COT-CDR and CWP (cloud liquid water path)-CDR relationships are not unique, but affected by atmospheric aerosol loading. Furthermore, separation of cases with either polluted dust or smoke aerosol shows that aerosol-cloud interaction (ACI) is stronger for clouds mixed with smoke aerosol than for clouds mixed with dust, which is ascribed to the higher absorption efficiency of smoke than dust. The variation of cloud properties with AOD is analysed for various relative humidity and boundary layer thermodynamic and dynamic conditions, showing that high relative humidity favours larger cloud droplet particles and increases cloud formation, irrespective of vertical or horizontal level. Stable atmospheric conditions enhance cloud cover horizontally. However, unstable atmospheric conditions favour thicker and higher clouds. Dynamically, upward motion of air parcels can also facilitate the formation of thicker and higher clouds. Overall, the present study provides an understanding of the impact of aerosols on cloud properties over the YRD. In addition to the amount of aerosol particles (or AOD), evidence is provided that aerosol types and ambient environmental conditions need to be considered to understand the observed relationships between cloud properties and AOD.

Opposite Aerosol Index‐Cloud Droplet Effective Radius Correlations Over Major Industrial Regions and Their Adjacent Oceans

“…The computed slopes from linear regressions of CER versus AI on log‐log scale with LWP‐stratified for the layer 650–950 hPa over three anthropogenic regions and their adjacent oceans are summarized in Figure , which clearly show that for a given LWP, slopes are normally negative over ocean but positive over land. The opposite correlation over land has been reported, though not explained, in a few previous studies (Grandey & Stier, ; Liu et al, ; Tang et al, ; Wang et al, , ; Yuan et al, ). It is interesting to see that as LWP increases, the positive slopes over land become weaker while negative slopes over ocean change slightly.…”

“…In recent years, however, quite a few studies found that this relation is not always true; instead, the negative correlation between aerosol particles and CER is not found distinctly or could be even positive; that is, CER increases with aerosol number (Bulgin et al, 2008;Grandey & Stier, 2010;Liu et al, 2017;Sekiguchi et al, 2003;Tang et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014Wang et al, , 2015Yuan et al, 2008). It is acknowledged that aerosol-cloud interactions are quite complex processes, influenced by both aerosol microphysics ( composition) and meteorological conditions.…”

Exploring aerosol cloud interaction using VOCALS-REx aircraft measurements

“…However, not all aerosols on the vertical column are actually involved in cloud formation, thus this 130 assumption is relatively rough. Several studies revealed that aerosols have little effect on cloud properties when aerosol and cloud layers are clearly separated Bré on, 2010, 2013;Liu et al, 2017). In this study, the impact of CCN number concentration near cloud layer, e.g.…”

Evaluation of aerosol and cloud properties in three climate models using MODIS observations and its corresponding COSP simulator, as well as their application in aerosol–cloud interactions

“…The analysis of aerosol-cloud interactions has been reported in literature by a variety of methods: studies presenting results from global scales (Feingold et al, 2001;Quaas et al, 2010) to regional scales (e.g. Saponaro et al, 2017;Ban-Weiss et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2017Liu et al, , 2018 and in situ observations (e.g. Sporre et al, 2014), using different approaches, i.e.…”