2016
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Air Quality in Selected Areas of a Poultry Processing Plant With the Use of a Microbiological Air Sampler

Abstract: Poultry processing plant, microbiological air quality, impaction technique. ABSTRACTThe aim of the study was to analyze the air quality in selected production facilities specified as the so-called "high-risk zones". Air samples were analyzed using either the sedimentation or the impaction methods. The impaction method showed the applicability of the air sampler in in-situ measurements. An increase in the numbers of aerobic bacteria was observed in most air sample collection sites as the duration of the produc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth emphasizing that the tested plant material was not treated to any initial technological process, such as washing, but only dried at 40 °C. However, due to the variability of the tested material’s composition and the possibility of environmental factors’ effect on its quality, it is recommended to control the microbiological purity of each batch of raw material or consider implementing simple methods to increase the tested material’s microbiological quality [ 46 , 47 ]. The results of the microbiological quality assessment are presented in Table 1 as CFU/g DL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth emphasizing that the tested plant material was not treated to any initial technological process, such as washing, but only dried at 40 °C. However, due to the variability of the tested material’s composition and the possibility of environmental factors’ effect on its quality, it is recommended to control the microbiological purity of each batch of raw material or consider implementing simple methods to increase the tested material’s microbiological quality [ 46 , 47 ]. The results of the microbiological quality assessment are presented in Table 1 as CFU/g DL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial load given to the device in this experiment is substantially above the number of bacteria normally found in the contaminated air [29] . Active air sampling in an enclosed environment with the use of an air sampler would be the ideal approach to assess the effect of the device but such an experiment will fail to determine the capacity of the device in reducing bacterial counts [30] . From the experiment conducted herein, it is evident that the electric field used in this device substantially reduces the counts of bacteria in the airflow and an augmented effect can be achieved by combining the effect of UV radiation with the voltage ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SAS 100 TM instrument (PBI International, Milan, Italy) was used to determine bacterial count, with an airflow rate of 10 L/10 s. The sampling head was sterilized prior to each sampling and disinfected between measurements with 70% isopropyl alcohol (VWR International PBI, Milan, Italy). The air samples were collected into Petri dishes with Tryptic Soy Agar (Biolife, Milan, Italy) for enumeration of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, as reported elsewhere [37][38][39][40][41]. After incubation at 37 • C for 24 h, the grown colonies (CFU/m 3 ) were counted using a digital colony counter (J.P. Selecta, Barcelona, Spain), with results corrected as per the table and formula attached to the instrument.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%