2009
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Airplane Boarding Times

Abstract: We model and analyze the process of passengers boarding an airplane. We show how the model yields closed-form estimates for the expected boarding time in many cases of interest. Comparison of our computations with previous work, based on discrete event simulations, shows a high degree of agreement. Analysis of the model reveals a clear link between the efficiency of various airline boarding policies and a congestion parameter which is related to interior airplane design parameters, such as distance between row… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For reasons of comparability to the past and current airline boarding operations, all measured boarding times were linearly extrapolated (based an average of 76%) to a reference seat load factor of 90%. This approach contradicts the fact that the impact of seat load factor for the block boarding strategies (including back-to-front) shows a nonlinear behavior [7,20,33]. To allow a reliable comparison of the field trials with the simulation results, two approaches are used.…”
Section: Airline Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reasons of comparability to the past and current airline boarding operations, all measured boarding times were linearly extrapolated (based an average of 76%) to a reference seat load factor of 90%. This approach contradicts the fact that the impact of seat load factor for the block boarding strategies (including back-to-front) shows a nonlinear behavior [7,20,33]. To allow a reliable comparison of the field trials with the simulation results, two approaches are used.…”
Section: Airline Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work on patience sorting was undertaken by Burstein and Lankham [33], [34], [35]. Connections between patience sorting and airplane boarding times were found by Bachmat et al [12], [13] and between patience sorting and disk scheduling by Bachmat [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes significantly greater variations in boarding time and makes the error term ∆ D,n much larger, [4]. Nonetheless, rather miraculously the ranking of boarding policies which is produced by the estimate ℓ(C) √ n nearly coincides with the rankings given by very detailed computer simulations of the boarding process, [5,50]. The methods above led to a detailed understanding of back-tofront policies as practiced by many airlines.…”
Section: Problem Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 98%