1997
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0960:aoaams>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of an Air Motion System on a Light Aircraft for Boundary Layer Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we are concerned solely with a mean horizontal wind measurement observed during steady, level flight, which greatly relaxes some of the difficulties of the measurement (variations of angle of attack, pitch, etc.) We point out that there have been other airborne systems developed to also measure turbulence, but these systems required significant modifications to the basic airframe, such as the installation of booms (Crawford and Dobosy 1992) or wing pods (Wood et al 1997), or the installation of pressure ports on the aircraft nose (Brown et al 1983). While turbulence would be a desirable additional measurement, what we describe here is a system that requires no modification to the basic airframe and measures accurate mean horizontal winds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we are concerned solely with a mean horizontal wind measurement observed during steady, level flight, which greatly relaxes some of the difficulties of the measurement (variations of angle of attack, pitch, etc.) We point out that there have been other airborne systems developed to also measure turbulence, but these systems required significant modifications to the basic airframe, such as the installation of booms (Crawford and Dobosy 1992) or wing pods (Wood et al 1997), or the installation of pressure ports on the aircraft nose (Brown et al 1983). While turbulence would be a desirable additional measurement, what we describe here is a system that requires no modification to the basic airframe and measures accurate mean horizontal winds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Wind speed and direction estimates obtained from other aircraft-based systems have given standard deviations of 0.5-1.0 m s 21 and 108 for AAVs (van den Kroonenberg et al 2008) and 2 m s 21 for light aircraft (Wood et al 1997). 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fixed and rotating vanes 16,17 have been used to measure airflow relative to the aircraft; it is now more common to use a differential pressure method [18][19][20] to avoid the vibration and frequency response problems of long airdata booms. Further refinement of the hemispherical pressure sensing head used to sense flow angles is described by Wyngaard 21 and Wood 22 . A more advanced instrument is the BAT Probe 23-25 which uses a nine hole pressure port formation in conjunction with differential GPS and fast-response accelerometers to give wind vector measurements at up to 50 Hz.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%