“…Interestingly, the constant c ∈ [0, ∞) in (1.3) depends only upon the parameter s ∈ (0, 1) and not upon d ∈ N. More importantly, this demonstrates that one may trade out the highly non-local problem given by (1.1) for the local problem given by (1.2) and (1.3). This technique has also been recently further generalized to cases of arbitrary non-negative operators defined on Banach spaces [2,16,31,32,34]. While the above formulations (i.e., (1.1), (1.2), and (1.3)) may be used to provide insights into the continuous fractional Laplace operator with order s ∈ (0, 1), they cannot be directly used to provide any insight into the discrete case or the case where s ∈ (0, ∞).…”