2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of array spacing on tidal stream turbine farm performance using Large-Eddy Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we now investigate how the theoretical predictions of the performance of infinitely large tidal arrays compare to high-fidelity numerical predictions using LES. We adopt the well-validated in-house LES code digital offshore farms simulator (DOFAS) in which turbine blades are represented using an actuator line method (ALM) (Ouro et al 2019c) and the flow solver is fully parallelised using the message passing interface (MPI), providing a great computational scalability and performance (Ouro et al 2019a). Details of the flow solver are provided in Appendix A.…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we now investigate how the theoretical predictions of the performance of infinitely large tidal arrays compare to high-fidelity numerical predictions using LES. We adopt the well-validated in-house LES code digital offshore farms simulator (DOFAS) in which turbine blades are represented using an actuator line method (ALM) (Ouro et al 2019c) and the flow solver is fully parallelised using the message passing interface (MPI), providing a great computational scalability and performance (Ouro et al 2019a). Details of the flow solver are provided in Appendix A.…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing studies looking into tidal array optimisation have adopted low-fidelity flow models, such as two-dimensional shallow water models (Culley et al 2018), analytical wake models, e.g. Gaussian models (Stansby & Stallard 2015) and aforementioned theoretical models based on the LMADT (Nishino & Willden 2013;Draper & Nishino 2014), while high-fidelity simulations have been restricted to relatively small arrays with a limited number of configurations, due to their large computational expense (Afgan et al 2013;Chawdhary et al 2017;Ouro, Ramírez & Harrold 2019c). However, as the performance of tidal devices in arrays is driven by wake-turbine interactions as well as bathymetry-induced turbulence (Stallard et al 2013;, turbulence-resolving approaches such as large-eddy simulation (LES) are valuable to yield reliable hydrodynamics results as well as to build more accurate low-order models that can improve array optimisation tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach for the local and global hydrodynamics may be undertaken using higher-fidelity models such as those that utilise three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) (Abolghasemi et al, 2016;Deskos et al, 2017) or large-eddy simulation (LES) methods (Churchfield et al, 2013;Ouro et al, 2019) which inherently allow for greater insight and accuracy in the near-wake region by allowing both horizontal and vertical wake dispersion through scale-resolving simulations. Such simulations emphasise how wake avoidance is not only critical for maximum exploitation of the channel potential, but also in reducing turbulence onto downstream turbines which may compromise the devices' lifetime due to fatigue (Thiébaut et al, 2020).…”
Section: On the Characterisation Of Array Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Harrison [98] reports inconsistencies between the actuator BEM and actuator disk's predictions of power of in-line turbines, using an array of 10 turbines with infinite transverse rows: 7D and 2D, downstream and lateral offset, respectively. In comparison, results using the actuator line have been promising, although at a high cost, for predicting power and flow properties in a turbine array [82], [93], [94].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Turbine Performance and Wake Amentioning
confidence: 99%