2001
DOI: 10.1128/aem.67.6.2531-2537.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Bacterial Detachment from Substratum Surfaces by the Passage of Air-Liquid Interfaces

Abstract: A theoretical analysis of the detachment of bacteria adhering to substratum surfaces upon the passage of an air-liquid interface is given, together with experimental results for bacterial detachment in the absence and presence of a conditioning film on different substratum surfaces. Bacteria (Streptococcus sobrinus HG1025, Streptococcus oralis J22, Actinomyces naeslundii T14V-J1, Bacteroides fragilis 793E, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 974K) were first allowed to adhere to hydrophilic glass and hydrophobic dimeth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
150
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, endpoint assays of biofilm formation in PVC microtitre plates (figure 3) also showed a significant difference between wild-type and pil mutant biofilms (one-way ANOVA: F 2,21 Z46.66, p!0.001) but SPR and surface attachment of type IV pili A. T. A. Jenkins and others 257 again failed to distinguish between the pilA and pilT mutants themselves (two-sample t-test: pO0.5). We note that direct comparison of these visual assays with the SPR protocol is not strictly possible as the visual protocol involves additional passages through an airwater interface, which can substantially re-arrange biofilm structure (Gomez-Suarez et al 2001). However, we do not feel that this invalidates the comparisons between the behaviour of the wild-type and mutant bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, endpoint assays of biofilm formation in PVC microtitre plates (figure 3) also showed a significant difference between wild-type and pil mutant biofilms (one-way ANOVA: F 2,21 Z46.66, p!0.001) but SPR and surface attachment of type IV pili A. T. A. Jenkins and others 257 again failed to distinguish between the pilA and pilT mutants themselves (two-sample t-test: pO0.5). We note that direct comparison of these visual assays with the SPR protocol is not strictly possible as the visual protocol involves additional passages through an airwater interface, which can substantially re-arrange biofilm structure (Gomez-Suarez et al 2001). However, we do not feel that this invalidates the comparisons between the behaviour of the wild-type and mutant bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our case of a flexible polymer chain is therefore one of the simplest key examples to proceed along this important direction. Third, in general, the set-up we are proposing is realizable in experiments and relevant for biological systems where swarms of bacteria are moving close to flexible objects like at water-air interfaces [56][57][58][59][60][61]. Our two-dimensional model can indeed be realized e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the micrographs of DLD1 after immune-staining phase, showing DLD1 could be labeled with antibodies directed against cytokeratins and the nuclear dye Although it is not fully understood what is the mechanism of using air foam to release cell bound to the lumen of microfluidic devices that are immobilized with antibody functionalized SLB film, the model of air-water interface detaching bacteria adhered to a surface helps us realize these multi-physical phenomena. 33 Based on this model, the air-water interfacial force used to detach cells is closely related to interfacial tension and the position of a three-phase contact between a cell, air, and liquid, and it ranges from 0.02 dyn to 0.4 dyn. Exposed to the force, cell might be damaged in release phase.…”
Section: B Recovery Of Released Cancer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%