Analysis of barriers of total productive maintenance (TPM)

Attri, Rajesh; Grover, Sandeep; Dev, Nikhil; Kumar, Deepak

doi:10.1007/s13198-012-0122-9

Cited by 72 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To achieve the research purpose, this study employed a qualitative approach, i.e., interpretive structural modeling (ISM); the philosophical foundation for developing this application into complex situations as a communication tool was presented by Warfield [37]. ISM has been broadly utilized since its initiation, from the early literature on the policymaking [38][39][40][41], up to its wide use in recent managerial and developmental research [16,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An ISM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Implementing Green Campus Operations: Towards Higher Education Sustainability

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although various initiatives have been undertaken by the universities worldwide to ensure that their campus operates sustainably, there are emergent barriers that pose serious challenges to the practitioners and subsequently hinder the successful implementation. The research for this paper was built upon the discussion concerning ‘campus operations’, which is one of the dominant sustainability elements in the university systems. It analyzes the barriers for green campus operations implementation through a methodological approach, which was implemented in two tiers. For identification of the barriers, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed and consulted with academic experts who have been involved in greening campus operations in the university. Next, interpretive structural modeling was used to analyze and develop a model of interactions, mutual influence, and relationship among barriers. The results revealed an eighteen-barrier interpretive structural model with eight levels. The analysis indicated that ‘lack of awareness’, ‘lack of knowledge’, ‘resistance to change’, and ‘inefficient communication’ are the dominant barriers with high driving and low dependence powers. The research findings highlighted the importance of this structural model for universities to facilitate the implementation of campus operations by removing the dominant barriers.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An ISM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Implementing Green Campus Operations: Towards Higher Education Sustainability

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cooke's research was further argued by Baglee et al (2007) that four main barriers should be represented by financial, management involvement, employee skills, and time. Attri et al (2013), Panneerselvam (2012), and Poduval and Pramod (2015) has adopted Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approaches to identify various implementation barriers which includes behavior, technical, operational, strategic, and human & cultural barriers. Attri et al (2014) further introduced a graph theoretical approach to identify the intensity between these identified barriers.…”

Section: Tpm Implementation Barriersmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review on lean maintenance through various implementations of total productive maintenance models

2017

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

TPM is the main tool used to perform lean maintenance and studies have shown significant increase in business performance upon successful implementations. This paper mainly reviews the lean maintenance through effective implementations of TPM. This includes the background of lean maintenance, objective of TPM, benefits of implementing TPM, TPM models, implementation barriers and factors of success to overcome these barriers. Recommendations for improving the cost effectiveness for TPM implementations are also included in this paper.

show abstract

“…Zaabi et al (2013) have analysed the interaction between the barriers of sustainable supply chain management implementation by using ISM approach. Attri et al (2013b) have analysed barriers of TPM using ISM approach. Kumar and Sharma (2014) have developed an ISM-based framework for structural relationship among the various manufacturing flexibility dimensions.…”

Section: Ism Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing the weighted ISM-MICMAC framework for process design stage of production system life cycle

Attri

Grover

2017

IJPMB

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The main purpose of this paper is to develop a framework for the process design stage of production system life cycle (PSLC) using weighted interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis. In the present study, various quality enabled factors (QEFs) of process design stage has been identified through the extensive literature analysis and opinions of industrial and academic experts. In order to validate the identified QEFs, a questionnaire survey has been utilised. Then, QEFs are analysed by using ISM approach in order to develop the relationship among the considered QEFs. Afterwards, Matriced Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliqueeaun Classement (MICMAC) analysis is used to identify the driving and dependence power of QEFs. Lastly, a method of effectiveness index (EI) has been used for identifying the key areas of process design stage of PSLC. This index can be effectively utilised by the manufacturing organisations to benchmark their process design phase through effectively utilising the QEFs reported in this work.Keywords: process design; production system; quality enabled factors; QEFs; interpretive structural modelling; ISM; effectiveness index; EI; Matriced Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliqueeaun Classement; MICMAC.Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Attri, R. and and Grover, S. Developing the weighted ISM-MICMAC framework 95 journals and conferences. He guides research at post-graduate and doctorate levels, and his research areas include total quality management, manufacturing management, and human resource management. With more than 20 years of teaching and research experience, currently he is working as a Professor in the

show abstract

Analysis of barriers of total productive maintenance (TPM)

Cited by 72 publications

References 56 publications

An ISM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Implementing Green Campus Operations: Towards Higher Education Sustainability

An ISM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Implementing Green Campus Operations: Towards Higher Education Sustainability

A review on lean maintenance through various implementations of total productive maintenance models

Developing the weighted ISM-MICMAC framework for process design stage of production system life cycle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About