2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of behavioral asymmetries in the elevated plus-maze and in the T-maze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second measure, referred to as preference change , takes into account any initial biases by comparing the proportion of time spent with the two objects in Trial 1 to the proportion of time spent with the two objects in Trial 2. Previous research has reported that individual rats exhibit side‐biases in behavioral tests and that rotational behavior differs between ages and sexes (e.g., Becker, Robinson, & Lorenz, 1982; Hyde & Jerussi, 1983; Schwarting & Borta, 2005). To take into account any biases that could affect the time spent with either object in Trial 1 (including individual preferences for a specific object), a side preference was calculated for both Trials 1 and 2 [(Time with right object − Time with left object)/(Total time with both objects) × 100], with a negative value representing a left‐side preference, and a positive value indicating a right‐side preference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second measure, referred to as preference change , takes into account any initial biases by comparing the proportion of time spent with the two objects in Trial 1 to the proportion of time spent with the two objects in Trial 2. Previous research has reported that individual rats exhibit side‐biases in behavioral tests and that rotational behavior differs between ages and sexes (e.g., Becker, Robinson, & Lorenz, 1982; Hyde & Jerussi, 1983; Schwarting & Borta, 2005). To take into account any biases that could affect the time spent with either object in Trial 1 (including individual preferences for a specific object), a side preference was calculated for both Trials 1 and 2 [(Time with right object − Time with left object)/(Total time with both objects) × 100], with a negative value representing a left‐side preference, and a positive value indicating a right‐side preference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in rats using the plus-maze or T-maze demonstrated asymmetries in turning direction in favor of the right/clockwise (Andrade, Alwarshetty, Sudha, & Chandra, 2001; Schwarting, & Borta, 2005). The findings in rodents have been supported by the findings of studies in fishes.…”
Section: Directionality Bias In Turning or Rotational Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data concerning spatial preference are, however, rather ambiguous even for laboratory mammals such as rats or hamsters [17,22]. Most evidence concerning motor bilateral asymmetries in laboratory mammals is from the study of paw preference in "reaching" reactions [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%