2019
DOI: 10.1137/18m1215700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Boundary Effects on PDE-Based Sampling of Whittle--Matérn Random Fields

Abstract: We consider the generation of samples of a mean-zero Gaussian random field with Matérn covariance function. Every sample requires the solution of a differential equation with Gaussian white noise forcing, formulated on a bounded computational domain. This introduces unwanted boundary effects since the stochastic partial differential equation is originally posed on the whole R d , without boundary conditions. We use a window technique, whereby one embeds the computational domain into a larger domain, and postul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(101 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variance with the SPDE method ( Figure 3B) showed instead a strong boundary effect, being significantly larger close to the boundary. This is a known effect of Neumann boundary conditions [12]. Finally, we computed the correlation with respect to the geodesic distance from point (0.25, 0.25) towards point (0.75, 0.25): see Figure 3C, reporting excellent agreement.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The variance with the SPDE method ( Figure 3B) showed instead a strong boundary effect, being significantly larger close to the boundary. This is a known effect of Neumann boundary conditions [12]. Finally, we computed the correlation with respect to the geodesic distance from point (0.25, 0.25) towards point (0.75, 0.25): see Figure 3C, reporting excellent agreement.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…such that , ( b ) is small) will be largely unaffected by the artificial boundaries. This point has been analyzed in mathematical detail in a recent article by Khristenko et al (2018). From Figure 7, it is interesting to notice that, apart from a few isolated points in the interior of the domain, the amplitude errors are negative; that is, the amplitude is mostly underestimated.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Diagonal Elements Ofmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…such that c m , ℓ ( r b ) is small) will be largely unaffected by the artificial boundaries. This point has been analyzed in mathematical detail in a recent article by Khristenko et al ().…”
Section: Application To Unstructured Satellite Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, equation (2.8) is solved on a bounded domain with arbitrary boundary conditions [25,31,41].…”
Section: Matérn Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%