2009
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.25.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Chlorothalonil by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Using Negative-ion Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 g) in the wild-mouth bottles with different concentrations of 1, 2, 5, 10, 100 mg/L, respectively. [39][40] In the following experiments, the parent ion m/z 266 ([C 8 C l4 N 2 ] + ) of chlorothalonil is taken as the characteristic signal. 1 In the present work, we choose corundum rods as the sample substrate.…”
Section: 3chemicals and Soil Samples Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 g) in the wild-mouth bottles with different concentrations of 1, 2, 5, 10, 100 mg/L, respectively. [39][40] In the following experiments, the parent ion m/z 266 ([C 8 C l4 N 2 ] + ) of chlorothalonil is taken as the characteristic signal. 1 In the present work, we choose corundum rods as the sample substrate.…”
Section: 3chemicals and Soil Samples Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its highly toxic to aquatic species and marine organisms, signicant cumulative toxicity 3,4 and more toxic and persistent of its main metabolites (4-OH-CTL) in the environment, CTL and its metabolites are considered as a probable human carcinogen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 12 The most popular approaches for accurate and precise determination of CTL are based on highly sensitive detectors equipped with chromatographic units such as gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) [13][14][15] or electron capture detectors, 16,17 and HPLC with DAD detection 18 or coupled with MS. 6 However, susceptibility to factors such as pH 8 and matrix components 19 makes CTL a nasty pesticide of poor recovery for sample preparation prior to chromatographic analysis. In addition, the need of specialized persons and high cost limit their application for on-site screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical analytical methods for detecting CTN are high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Galera, Vidal, & Frenich, 1997), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS; Chaves, Shea, & Danehower, 2008;Yamamoto et al, 2009), and gas chromatography (Kurz et al, 2008;Vargyas, Walls, Bramstedt, & Eilrich, 2000). These methods require extensive sample preparation and well-trained personnel to operate sophisticated instruments and interpret the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%