2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of clinical management of infected breast implants and of factors associated to successful breast pocket salvage in infections occurring after breast reconstruction

Abstract: Patient selection in clinical practice leads to differences in patients with breast implant infection who are considered for attempts at implant salvage vs. those who are treated with implant removal. Salvage of breast implant pockets can be obtained in the majority of patients with combined one-step implant replacement surgery and antibiotic treatment. Increased efforts and protocols to recruit patients into pocket salvage management are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Susceptibility testing of the staphylococcal isolates found drug resistance in 63% [9]. In patients with breast implant infection, the vast majority of isolates are Gram-positive microorganisms (83%), with the rate of methicillin-sensitive staphylococci of 49% and a much lower proportion of infections due to methicillin-resistant vs. susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA vs. MSSA, 3.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility testing of the staphylococcal isolates found drug resistance in 63% [9]. In patients with breast implant infection, the vast majority of isolates are Gram-positive microorganisms (83%), with the rate of methicillin-sensitive staphylococci of 49% and a much lower proportion of infections due to methicillin-resistant vs. susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA vs. MSSA, 3.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide, the reported incidence of BRSPM infection has wide variation at 1–35% [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ]. BRSPM procedures have a higher incidence of infections compared with cosmetic breast augmentation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide, the reported incidence of BRSPM infection has wide variation at 1–35% [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ]. BRSPM procedures have a higher incidence of infections compared with cosmetic breast augmentation [ 9 ]. Sources of infection include environmental contamination of the implant or surgical milieu, breaches in skin integrity and haematogenous or contiguous spread [ [12] , [13] , [14] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant infections generally occur more than 30 days after surgery with Staphylococcus species [ [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic approaches vary among hospitals, but mainly include two main types: conservative and surgical [ 6 , 9 ]. Conservative treatment involves antibiotics alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%