Analysis of Clinician and Patient Factors and Completion of Telemedicine Appointments Using Video

Abstract

IMPORTANCETelemedicine provides patients access to episodic and longitudinal care. Policy discussions surrounding future support for telemedicine require an understanding of factors associated with successful video visits. OBJECTIVE To assess patient and clinician factors associated with successful and with failed video visits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a quality improvement study of 137 846 scheduled video visits at a single academic health system in southeastern Wisconsin between March 1 and December 31, 2020, supplemented with patient experience survey data. Patient information was gathered using demographic information abstracted from the electronic health record and linked with block-level socioeconomic data from the US Census Bureau. Data on perceived clinician experience with technology was obtained using the survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome of interest was the successful completion of a scheduled video visit or the conversion of the video visit to a telephone-based service. Visit types and administrative data were used to categorize visits. Mixed-effects modeling with pseudo R 2 values was performed to compare the relative associations of patient and clinician factors with video visit failures. RESULTS In total, 75 947 patients and 1155 clinicians participated in 137 846 scheduled video encounters, 17 190 patients (23%) were 65 years or older, and 61 223 (81%) patients were of White race and ethnicity. Of the scheduled video encounters, 123 473 (90%) were successful, and 14 373 (10%) were converted to telephone services. A total of 16 776 patients (22%) completed a patient experience survey. Lower clinician comfort with technology (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.28), advanced patient age (66-80 years: OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.26-0.30), lower patient socioeconomic status (including low high-speed internet availability) (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and patient racial and ethnic minority group status (Black or African American: OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81) were associated with conversion to telephone visits. Patient characteristics accounted for systematic components for success; marginal pseudo R 2 values decreased from 23% (95% CI, 21.1%-26.1%) to 7.8% (95% CI, 6.3%-9.4%) with exclusion of patient factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEAs policy makers consider expanding telehealth coverage and hospital systems focus on investments, consideration of patient support, equity, and friction should guide decisions. In particular, this quality improvement study suggests that underserved patients may become disproportionately vulnerable by cuts in coverage for telephone-based services.

Disparities in Telemedicine Success and Their Association With Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Thoracic Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…We hypothesized that important clinical information could be missed via audio-only connections, and video visits were considered both the institutional and the Medicare standard to replace in-person visits, with limited reimbursement given for audio-only visits. 19 Subsequent studies have used a similar method to identify unsuccessful visits, 6 , 20 and video visits, rather than telephone only, were rated as highly as in-person visits. 21 Inability to complete audio and visual assessments may be associated with some of the negative outcomes we observed or may be a surrogate for a more disadvantaged patient population at risk of inferior outcomes.…”

Hospitalization Outcomes Among Patients With COVID-19 Undergoing Remote Monitoring

“…These disparities have been observed in many other digital health interventions, including video visits and telemedicine. 49 , 50 , 51 …”

Assessing the Impact of a Pre-visit Readiness Telephone Call on Video Visit Success Rates

“…For instance, several studies have found that older age, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance coverage, and living in zip codes with low broadband access are associated with the following: (1) lower probability of using video-based care, and (2) greater conversion of video visits to telephone visits. 2 – 4 Focusing this type of intervention on digitally vulnerable populations could be one simple, system-based way to bridge the digital divide. Moreover, a recent study found that practice- (38%) and clinician-level (26%) factors drove more of the variation in video visit use than patient-level factors (9%) 3 —illustrating that health care providers and systems have significant control over the modality through which they deliver care.…”