2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.106010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of cloud effects on long-term global and diffuse photosynthetically active radiation at a Mediterranean site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly distribution of PAR 7+/,*+ shows a clear cycle, with maximum mean and median values around May and July for all locations, and the lowest values during winter. This seasonality trend is similarly observed in other studies for the northern hemisphere, such as the study byLozano et al (2022) in Granada, Spain (37.16° N, 3.61° W). However, the magnitude of PAR 7+/,*+ differs.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The monthly distribution of PAR 7+/,*+ shows a clear cycle, with maximum mean and median values around May and July for all locations, and the lowest values during winter. This seasonality trend is similarly observed in other studies for the northern hemisphere, such as the study byLozano et al (2022) in Granada, Spain (37.16° N, 3.61° W). However, the magnitude of PAR 7+/,*+ differs.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…For the investigated 374 sites, the trend is similar for all the years with a slight alteration in 2018 due to decreased amount of clouds, 375 which brought overall lower values of PAR .01123-. The annual mean PAR .01123-value for the locations 376 studied was 46.65 W/m 2 , marginally lower (59 W/m 2 ) than the one reported by Lozano et al (2022) in 377 Granada (Spain) 2008-2018 and higher (35 W/m 2 ) than the one reported by Trisolino et al (2018) The analysis demonstrates that the seasonality variation of PAR components and the relationship with cloudiness in high latitudes is similar to mid-latitudes in the northern hemisphere. However, the magnitude of the PAR components decreases as the location moves further north.…”
Section: 335contrasting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These two last variables in the PAR range are defined as: Kt,PAR=i=124PARGlobali=124ITOA,PAR ${K}_{t,PAR}^{\prime }=\frac{\sum\limits _{i=1}^{24}{PAR}_{Global}}{\sum\limits _{i=1}^{24}{I}_{TOA,PAR}}$ ΨPAR=kt,PARtime1+kt,PARtime+12 ${{\Psi }}_{PAR}=\frac{{k}_{t,PAR}^{time-1}+{k}_{t,PAR}^{time+1}}{2}$ The third model (M3) is the adaptation of the Ridley's model suggested by Lozano et al. (2022) who analyzed the relationship between k PAR and k t concluding in their preliminary analysis that k PAR can be predicted directly from TSI. Therefore, the resulting expression is the following: kPAR=11+ec1+c2kt+c3AST+c4α+c5Kt+c6Ψ ${k}_{PAR}=\frac{1}{1+{e}^{\left({c}_{1}+{c}_{2}{k}_{t}+{c}_{3}AST+{c}_{4}\alpha +{c}_{5}{K}_{t}^{\prime }+{c}_{6}{\Psi }\right)}}$ where c i are the fitting coefficients, k ' t is the daily clearness index and Ψ is the persistence index, and are defined as: Kt=falsefalsei=124TSIGlobalfalsefalsei=124...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%