2020
DOI: 10.1111/biom.13399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of clustered interval‐censored data using a class of semiparametric partly linear frailty transformation models

Abstract: A flexible class of semiparametric partly linear frailty transformation models is considered for analyzing clustered interval‐censored data, which arise naturally in complex diseases and dental research. This class of models features two nonparametric components, resulting in a nonparametric baseline survival function and a potential nonlinear effect of a continuous covariate. The dependence among failure times within a cluster is induced by a shared, unobserved frailty term. A sieve maximum likelihood estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In model ( 2), we assume a linear effect of W on the log-hazard, but the effect of Z is potentially nonlinear. An appealing feature of the PLSIM is that the class of models includes both the partially linear survival model (with Z being univariate) 32,33 and the single-index survival models (in the absence of W ) 24,25 as special cases. Based on (1) and ( 2), the population survival function is…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In model ( 2), we assume a linear effect of W on the log-hazard, but the effect of Z is potentially nonlinear. An appealing feature of the PLSIM is that the class of models includes both the partially linear survival model (with Z being univariate) 32,33 and the single-index survival models (in the absence of W ) 24,25 as special cases. Based on (1) and ( 2), the population survival function is…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fit SIM/PLSIM, a variety of estimation methods have been proposed, which include but are not limited to the kernel smoothing methods 9,21,24 and spline approximations; 25,27 piecewise linear functions 32,33 are special cases of splines. A particular choice of splines is the Bernstein polynomial (BP), 34 which has been adopted to approximate the baseline cumulative hazard functions in the bivariate transformation survival models, 35 to approximate nonlinear covariate effects in the additive Cox model for interval-censored data, 36 and to approximate the distribution function in the semiparametric transformation non-mixture cure models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sieve approach is one of the most well-developed methods for estimating infinitedimensional parameters. [31][32][33] Specifically, we use Bernstein polynomials to build a sieve space…”
Section: Sieve Likelihood With Bernstein Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sieve approach is one of the most well-developed methods for estimating infinite-dimensional parameters. 3133 Specifically, we use Bernstein polynomials to build a sieve space Θ n = falsefalse{ θ n = false( β T , α , κ , Λ 1 n , Λ 2 n ) T B scriptM n 1 scriptM n 2 falsefalse}. Here, scriptM n j is the space defined by Bernstein polynomials:where B .1em j , k false( t , m .1em j n , c , u false) represents the Bernstein basis polynomial defined as:with degree m .1em j n = o false( n ν j false) for some ν j false( 0 , 1 false).…”
Section: Estimation and Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun and Ding 19 considered the semi‐parametric transformation models for bivariate general interval‐censored survival data based on the two‐parameter Achimedean copula model. Lee et al 20 studied a class of semi‐parametric partly linear frailty transformation models for clustered interval‐censored data. All the aforementioned papers adopted the sieve maximum likelihood estimation (sieve‐MLE) approach where the estimators are shown to be consistent, asymptotically normal and efficient, but their methods do not accommodate data with a cure fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%