2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijds.2019.100322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of co-authorship network based on some betweenness centrality concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malaysia had the greatest influence on building international collaboration networks according to the betweenness centrality of co‐authorships, followed by the USA, Germany, and Italy. Betweenness centrality indicates how effective communication occurs in a network and the corresponding key actors 28,29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malaysia had the greatest influence on building international collaboration networks according to the betweenness centrality of co‐authorships, followed by the USA, Germany, and Italy. Betweenness centrality indicates how effective communication occurs in a network and the corresponding key actors 28,29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betweenness centrality indicates how effective communication occurs in a network and the corresponding key actors. 28,29 In total, 217 institutions were identified; of these, 64.98% accounted for only a single publication. Eight institutions contributed to 5 or more publications, namely Hacettepe University (n = 11, 6.43%; Turkey), University of Pennsylvania (n = 10, 5.85%; USA), Universitat Internacional De Catalunya (n = 8, 4.68%; Spain), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (n = 7, 4.09%; Taiwan), Osaka University (n = 7, 4.09%; Japan), Yonsei University (n = 6, 3.51%; Korea), University of Berne (n = 5, 2.92%; Switzerland), and University of Coimbra (n = 5, 2.92%; Portugal) (Figure S2B).…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%