2018
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1556395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of collaboration networks in OpenStreetMap through weighted social multigraph mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a better understanding of the quality of VGI may help the adoption of crowdsourced geospatial data in some projects as the perception of unreliability may impede the adoption. To address the issues on trust, transparency and reliability Truong et al (2018) looked at the contributors behaviour and their interactions. They qualified the behaviour of contributors to OpenStreetMap (OSM) through a multigraph approach to reproduce contributor's interactions in a more comprehensive way.…”
Section: Vgi Data Quality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having a better understanding of the quality of VGI may help the adoption of crowdsourced geospatial data in some projects as the perception of unreliability may impede the adoption. To address the issues on trust, transparency and reliability Truong et al (2018) looked at the contributors behaviour and their interactions. They qualified the behaviour of contributors to OpenStreetMap (OSM) through a multigraph approach to reproduce contributor's interactions in a more comprehensive way.…”
Section: Vgi Data Quality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This editorial highlights how these issues are discussed and addressed by the articles of this special issue and how the papers highlight emerging technologies, concepts, platforms, debates, and methodologies and techniques within VGI and suggest future research directions. This special issue gathered papers on the topics of crowdsourced geospatial data quality (Ballatore and Arsanjani 2018), thematic uncertainty and consistency across data sources (Hervey and Kuhn 2018), spatial biases (Millar et al, 2018), trust issues within VGI (Severinsen et al 2019), and contributors behaviour and interactions (Truong et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of past vandalism cases showed the contribution patterns, and the behaviour of the contributor in the OSM platform was key to identify these cases [5,6,9], so we included some contributor information in our corpus and decided to add fake users as contributors of the fake vandalism. The contributors can be characterised by their age in the project [9,20], their number of past contributions [14,21], or by their interactions with other OSM users [22,23]. These measures can be computed for existing contributors, but for fake contributors, the ones based on the analysis of the interactions with the other users are very complex to simulate.…”
Section: Vandalizing the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Для этого слой сохраняется в «shape» файл или в БД, и в качестве параметра выбирается новая система. Но при выводе проекта на экран все слои приводят в единую координатную плоскость [5][6][7].…”
Section: методология применения инструментария гис для управления труunclassified