2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Colonoscopy Withdrawl Time and Detection of Adenomatous Colon Polyp in a High Volume Private Practice Endocenter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyp detection rates did not change over the course of the intervention (P ϭ .63). 37 Five abstracts (in 4 patient populations) described interventions that provided physician feedback on adenoma/ polyp detection rates and withdrawal times together 38,39 or adenoma detection rates alone. 27,40,41 The studies were relatively short-term interventions over 3 to 8 months.…”
Section: Total Withdrawal Time Plus Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polyp detection rates did not change over the course of the intervention (P ϭ .63). 37 Five abstracts (in 4 patient populations) described interventions that provided physician feedback on adenoma/ polyp detection rates and withdrawal times together 38,39 or adenoma detection rates alone. 27,40,41 The studies were relatively short-term interventions over 3 to 8 months.…”
Section: Total Withdrawal Time Plus Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two small studies showed trends toward improvement that were not statistically significant, 38,40,41 and the other 2 showed no improvement. 27,39 In general, almost all the abstracts demonstrated that withdrawal times could be increased but that this did not consistently result in improved adenoma detection rates.…”
Section: Total Withdrawal Time Plus Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%