2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of combining ability over environments in diallel crosses of maize ( Zea mays )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
49
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
49
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hybrid TZEI-13 × TZEI-17 which showed higher negative SCA effects for GY indicates the unsuitability of both parents as good specific combiners for grain yield. This report supported the findings of Pswarayi and Vivek (2008) and Murtadha et al (2016) who also observed differences in the expression of GCA and SCA with stress. Under both conditions, TZEI-17 × TZEI-25 was the most promising cross for improving GY followed by TZEI-13 × TZEI-23 due to the highest positive SCA on one hand and high significant SCA on other hand for the following characters GY and ear weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, hybrid TZEI-13 × TZEI-17 which showed higher negative SCA effects for GY indicates the unsuitability of both parents as good specific combiners for grain yield. This report supported the findings of Pswarayi and Vivek (2008) and Murtadha et al (2016) who also observed differences in the expression of GCA and SCA with stress. Under both conditions, TZEI-17 × TZEI-25 was the most promising cross for improving GY followed by TZEI-13 × TZEI-23 due to the highest positive SCA on one hand and high significant SCA on other hand for the following characters GY and ear weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar results were published from other studies, such as grain yield (Doerksen et al, 2003;Laouali, 2014), DS 50% (Zare et al, 2011), leaf senescence (BaduApraku, 2011), plant aspect (Laouali, 2014) and ASI, PHT, EHT, leaf rolling (Premlatha and Kalamani, 2010;Aminu and Izge, 2013;Aminu et al, 2014a;Murtadha et al, 2016). This indicated that these traits were highly influenced by environmental factors and there is adequate genetic variability among the inbred lines to allow good progress from selection for improvement in the traits (Badu-Apraku et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Y ijkl = μ + g i + g j + s ij + r ij + l k + b(l) lk + gl ik + gl jk + sl ijk + rl ijk +ei jkl (Murtadha et al 2016) Y ijkl = nilai pengamatan dari setiap unit μ = nilai rata-rata umum g i = pengaruh DGU tetua I g j = pengaruh DGU tetua j s ij = pengaruh DGK F1 antara tetua ij r ij = pengaruh DGK F1 resiprok antara tetua ij l k = pengaruh lokasi k b(l) lk = pengaruh ulangan l dalam lokasi k gl ik = pengaruh interaksi DGU x L tetua i pada lokasi k gl jk = pengaruh interaksi DGU x L tetua j pada lokasi k sl ijk = pengaruh interaksi DGK x L F1 antara tetua ij pada lokasi k rl ijk = pengaruh interaksi DGK x L F1 resiprok antara tetua ij pada lokasi k ei jkl = pengaruh galat Analisis gabungan untuk mengetahui pengaruh DGK dan DGU pada kondisi cekaman kekeringan, N rendah, dan normal menggunakan program The SAS System for Windows 9.1 dengan prosedur PROC SQ1 macro pro (Zhang et al 2005).…”
Section: Bahan Dan Metodeunclassified