2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of commercial short rotation coppices in Bavaria, southern Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, machine 4 (feller-chipper that worked only in SRC-plantation with a medium-length rotation) showed a low working rate because its working process was not continuous due to difficulty in cutting trees with large diameters (up to 400 mm). In fact, under these conditions, manual cutting and harvesting can be economically competitive compared to mechanical systems [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, machine 4 (feller-chipper that worked only in SRC-plantation with a medium-length rotation) showed a low working rate because its working process was not continuous due to difficulty in cutting trees with large diameters (up to 400 mm). In fact, under these conditions, manual cutting and harvesting can be economically competitive compared to mechanical systems [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a little information about fast growing and short rotation coppice wood biomass plant species from swamp-peat forests, including their energy potency, is available so far. Most of the information of energy plant species were reported from the lowland forest areas, such as Willow (Salix viminalis), Poplar (Populus trichocarpa),_ Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and also Acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) trees, commonly used in Denmark, Germany, Poland, Italy, New Zealand and other European countries (Sims et al 2001;Sims and Venturi 2004;Fiala and Bacenetti 2012;Dillen et al 2013;Ghaley and Porter 2014;Hauk et al 2014;Haverkamp and Musshoff 2014;Krzyzaniak et al 2015;Niemczyk et al 2018). Similar situation exists in Indonesia forest energy sector where very limited number of plant species, such as Calliandra calothyrsus, Glyricidia sepium, Macaranga hypoleuca and Vitex pinnata are known as the energy feedstock (Amirta et al 2016a;2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural crops, plant residues, forest resources and special energy plants are common biomass sources to produce energy (Avcıoglu et al 2019). The shrub species are also reported as good potential feedstock to provide sustainable energy (Dillen et al 2013;Ghaley and Porter 2014;Hauk et al 2014;Haverkamp and Musshoff 2014;Pérez et al 2014;Krzyzaniak et al 2015;Niemczyk et al 2018;Gonzalez-Gonzalez et al 2017;Amirta et al 2016a;Martinez et al 2019). On the other hand, investigation about unutilized biomass sources such as agricultural waste shows great promise as an alternative to cheap raw material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%