2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of common cause failure effect on system reliability in seismic PSA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the joints undergo coordinated deformation, the internal force of the prefabricated component without joints is greater than or equal to that with joints, which is consistent with the conclusion obtained from the comparative analysis of the internal force of cast-in-place and fabricated station structures in relevant studies [31,49]. According to relevant literature, the change in seismic conditions [50][51][52] and peak acceleration [53][54][55] of a seismic wave will increase the seismic response of underground structures and, more importantly, will obviously change the seismic response characteristics. In order to further analyze the influence of the joint distribution on the seismic response of the fabricated station structure, the seismic conditions and peak acceleration were analyzed and the results are given in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 according to the research ideas of Section 4.1.…”
Section: Internal Forcesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since the joints undergo coordinated deformation, the internal force of the prefabricated component without joints is greater than or equal to that with joints, which is consistent with the conclusion obtained from the comparative analysis of the internal force of cast-in-place and fabricated station structures in relevant studies [31,49]. According to relevant literature, the change in seismic conditions [50][51][52] and peak acceleration [53][54][55] of a seismic wave will increase the seismic response of underground structures and, more importantly, will obviously change the seismic response characteristics. In order to further analyze the influence of the joint distribution on the seismic response of the fabricated station structure, the seismic conditions and peak acceleration were analyzed and the results are given in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 according to the research ideas of Section 4.1.…”
Section: Internal Forcesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, each probability of top event is determined by using fault tree analysis. Data of component failure is adopted AP1000 data which was published and IAEA generic data [8][9][10][11][12]. Finally, the total probability of event sequences are calculated.…”
Section: Kne Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis is done by using event tree and each probability of top event is calculated by using fault tree analysis. Failure rate of component used in calculation is based on AP1000 data that is published by Westinghouse and data from IAEA Tecdoc [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the research based on CCF has many results in power systems, energy systems, and other fields. [26][27][28][29] Among the abundant studies in the literature mentioned, the bi-level maintenance strategy is researched, and the common cause failure is also combined with other problems to discuss. However, the problem of how to reasonably allocate the repairmen with multiple levels has not been solved when considering common cause failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the research based on CCF has many results in power systems, energy systems, and other fields. 26–29…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%