Analysis of Conjugate Heat Transfer for a Combined Turbulent Wall Jet and Offset Jet

Mondal, Tanmoy; Guha, Ayan; Das, Manab Kumar

doi:10.1115/1.4032287

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The isothermal temperature maintained at the bottom of the solid slab is higher than the offset jet inlet temperature. The conjugate heat transfer study from combined wall jet and offset jet flow is computationally investigated by Mondal et al (2016) using standard k −ε model in conjunction with wall functions. The ratio of distance between the two jets to the jet width is taken as one and the bottom wall of the solid slab is maintained at a constant temperature.…”

Section:    mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Conjugate Heat Transfer from Heated Plate by Turbulent Offset Jet in Presence of Freestream Motion using Low-Reynolds Number Modeling

Rathore

2019

JAFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study deals with conjugate heat transfer from a heated flat plate by a turbulent offset jet in presence of freestream motion. The turbulent convection in fluid and conduction in solid is solved in a coupled manner by simultaneously satisfying the equality of temperature and heat flux at the solid-fluid interface. The computations have been carried out using low-Reynolds number (LRN) k −ω SST model in the fluid region. The capability of LRN modeling have enabled to solve the entire boundary layer including the thin viscous sublayer due to which Moffatt vortices (secondary recirculation regions) have been captured near the corner of the wall where the turbulence Reynolds number is low. The bottom surface of solid plate is maintained at a constant temperature higher than the jet inlet temperature whereas the jet inlet temperature is same as that of the ambient. The present investigation reports the effects of offset ratio of jet (OR), Reynolds number of flow (Re), solid to fluid thermal conductivity ratio (K), solid slab thickness (S) and freestream velocity (U∞) on conjugate heat transfer arises due to solid and fluid interaction. The offset ratio is varied in the range OR = 3 − 11, Reynolds number in the range Re = 10000 − 25000, solid to fluid thermal conductivity ratio in the range K = 1 − 2000, solid slab thickness in the range S = 1−20 and freestream velocity in the range U∞ = 0.1 − 0.25. The effects of various parameters on the near-wall velocity profile, solid-fluid interface temperature, local Nusselt number variation along the plate, heat flux variation along the plate, etc. have been discussed in detail.

show abstract

Section:    mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Conjugate Heat Transfer from Heated Plate by Turbulent Offset Jet in Presence of Freestream Motion using Low-Reynolds Number Modeling

Rathore

2019

JAFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They investigated the effect of

R e, P r, S ∕ h

(slab thickness), and

k

(conductivity ratio) on heat transfer characteristics. Mondal et al 25 numerically investigated the CHT phenomena due to the combination of turbulent wall jet and offset jet flow using 2D URANS equations. Paulraj et al 26 presented a numerical investigation of CHT of wall jet flow (laminar) over a shallow cavity, which was heated from the bottom of the solid wall.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ψ‐v Computation of steady‐state conjugate heat transfer in backward‐facing step flow

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we study steady‐state conjugate heat transfer over a backward‐facing step flow using a combination of a compact finite difference scheme for the ψ ‐ v form of the Navier–Stokes equations and a higher‐order compact scheme for the temperature equations on nonuniform grids. We investigate the effect of Reynolds number ( 200 ≤ R e ≤ 800 ), conductivity ratio ( 1 ≤ k ≤ 1000 ), Prandtl number ( 0.1 ≤ P r ≤ 15 ), and slab thickness ( h ≤ b ≤ 6 h ) on the heat transfer characteristics. Isotherms remain clustered near the reattachment point in the fluid, while the temperature in the solid decreases vertically, with the minima at the reattachment point. Heat transfer rate (HTR) increases with Re, the maximum at the reattachment point. The HTR increases with k till k = 100 after, which it becomes invariant as k → ∞ . Isotherms at the inlet become more disorderly with increasing Pr, and progressively clustered near the interface, indicating an increase in HTR, while the temperature in the solid region decreases with Pr. Increasing b decreases the HTR. In addition to obtaining an excellent match with results previously reported in the literature, we offer more comprehensive and previously unreported insights on flow physics.

show abstract

Numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement of an inclined heated offset jet

Ajmi

Hnaien

Marzouk

et al. 2020

International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of Conjugate Heat Transfer for a Combined Turbulent Wall Jet and Offset Jet

Cited by 8 publications

References 22 publications

Study of Conjugate Heat Transfer from Heated Plate by Turbulent Offset Jet in Presence of Freestream Motion using Low-Reynolds Number Modeling

Study of Conjugate Heat Transfer from Heated Plate by Turbulent Offset Jet in Presence of Freestream Motion using Low-Reynolds Number Modeling

ψ‐v Computation of steady‐state conjugate heat transfer in backward‐facing step flow

Numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement of an inclined heated offset jet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About