2000
DOI: 10.1115/1.1308006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Contact Deformation and Stiction Between Textured Disk and Textured Slider

Abstract: To meet the ever-increasing magnetic recording density, the hard disk industry is focusing on reducing flying height. Texturing the slider surface to reduce the head–disk contact area is one of the most challenging and promising techniques in the current industry. In this study, a mathematical–physical model based on an extension of the Greenwood–Tripp model is proposed for predicting and analyzing the contact deformation and stiction between both textured disk and slider. The contact deformation and stiction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The model assumes that ͑i͒ the nominally flat rough surface is covered with hemispherically tipped asperities, ͑ii͒ the asperity summits have a constant radius, ͑iii͒ the heights of the asperities vary randomly, (iv) the asperities do not interact with one another, and (v) there is no deformation of the bulk. 29 If the pad is modeled as a nominally flat surface covered with hemispherical asperities and the wafer is modeled as a flat plane, a GW analysis of surface contact enables the calculation of the pad-wafer separation distance and the area of padwafer contact. The contact pressure may be described according to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The model assumes that ͑i͒ the nominally flat rough surface is covered with hemispherically tipped asperities, ͑ii͒ the asperity summits have a constant radius, ͑iii͒ the heights of the asperities vary randomly, (iv) the asperities do not interact with one another, and (v) there is no deformation of the bulk. 29 If the pad is modeled as a nominally flat surface covered with hemispherical asperities and the wafer is modeled as a flat plane, a GW analysis of surface contact enables the calculation of the pad-wafer separation distance and the area of padwafer contact. The contact pressure may be described according to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GW model assumes: ͑i͒ the nominally flat rough surface is covered with hemispherically tipped asperities, (ii) the asperity summits have a common radius, (iii) the heights of the asperities vary randomly, (iv) the asperities do not interact with one another, (v) there is no deformation of the bulk of either material, and (vi) Hertzian contact/deformation occurs at the interface. 10 Numerical comparisons between the GW model and other microcontact models have led to the conclusion that for a given nominal pressure ( P nominal ) the GW gives acceptable order-of-magnitude approximations for the number of contacts (N contact ) and the real contact area between a rough surface and a smooth flat plane. 11 The GW model has also been applied by others to describe various aspects of CMP, including, for example, descriptions of pad asperity-wafer contact and hydrodynamic pressure, 12 and local asperity pressures for asperities of constant height.…”
Section: Pressures On Pad Asperitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meniscus concept has recently been applied to the tribology of lubricated magnetic recording head and disk interfaces, e.g., [24,25]. We find that: (a) The meniscus volume is less than the volume of one Ztetraol 2000 lubricant chain; (b) The wetted perimeter is the length of about 8 lubricant chains stretched end to end; and (c) The wetted length is about 24 lubricant chain lengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%