2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00236-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of copper and calcium–fulvic acid complexation and competition effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold concentrations of Cu(II) for causing the aggregation and precipitation of HA were reported to be 50 and 140 μM, respectively. 31 The level of Cu(II) used in this study failed to result in either aggregation or precipitation. Therefore, the precipitation in this study can be attributed to the relatively high concentrations of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ in seawater.…”
Section: Influence Of Cu(ii) Concentration On Co-precipitationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The threshold concentrations of Cu(II) for causing the aggregation and precipitation of HA were reported to be 50 and 140 μM, respectively. 31 The level of Cu(II) used in this study failed to result in either aggregation or precipitation. Therefore, the precipitation in this study can be attributed to the relatively high concentrations of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ in seawater.…”
Section: Influence Of Cu(ii) Concentration On Co-precipitationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Mantoura et al [19] reported that Mg and Ca compete with Cu for binding sites on the humic acid molecule. Similarly, Iglesias et al [38] found that the degree of Cu complexation with fulvic acid decreased as the concentration of Ca 2þ in the exposure medium increased. This would indicate that DOC would be more effective at reducing the bioavailability of Cu in soft water than in hard water.…”
Section: Effect Of Doc On Cu Toxicity To Glochidiamentioning
confidence: 79%
“…They reported Cu 2+ loadings ranging from 5 · 10 -6 mol/ g DOC to 5 · 10 -4 mol/g DOC after titrating 15 different water samples taken from lakes, ponds, streams and rivers in North Western part of the UK, using similar ISE titration method with samples buffered at pH 6 and ionic strength of 0.1 M KNO 3 based on an initial total Cu 2+ concentration of 10 -6 M. David and Vance (1991) showed that hydrophobic and hydrophilic acids differ in their proton-binding capacities, and that lake water samples differ from stream samples (David and Vance 1991). Iglesias et al (2003) reported mean Cu 2+ -binding constant values of 5 (at pH 5.5) and 5.29 (at pH 6.5) while titrating dissolved isolated fulvic acid sample simulating natural water samples, at ionic strength of 0.1 M KNO 3 and DOM concentration of 100 mg/L (fulvic acid). Lu and Allen (2002) reported Cu 2+ -binding in three different DOM samples extracted by Reverse Osmosis and getting small amounts of strong Cu-binding sites, a total of 4.55 mmol/g DOC, which was much less than the total acidity (carboxylic and phenolic) but very close to the phenolic site content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%